Difference between revisions of "Team:UESTC-China/Improve"
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
<div class="part"> | <div class="part"> | ||
<div class="bigtitle" id="title_1">Overview </div> | <div class="bigtitle" id="title_1">Overview </div> | ||
| + | <div class="mainbody"> | ||
This year, we improved this reporter device (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_J364000">BBa_J364000</a>) into a surface display system (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_BBa_K3034007">BBa_K3034007</a>) by fusing GFP with INPNC. The improved system can anchor the downstream protein of INPNC to the surface of bacteria, while the GFP is used as the reporter gene. So, other teams who have the need of surface display can insert their target gene into this system. | This year, we improved this reporter device (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_J364000">BBa_J364000</a>) into a surface display system (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_BBa_K3034007">BBa_K3034007</a>) by fusing GFP with INPNC. The improved system can anchor the downstream protein of INPNC to the surface of bacteria, while the GFP is used as the reporter gene. So, other teams who have the need of surface display can insert their target gene into this system. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 50: | Line 51: | ||
<div class="bigtitle" id="title_2">Quantitative detection of fluorescence </div> | <div class="bigtitle" id="title_2">Quantitative detection of fluorescence </div> | ||
<div class="mainbody"> | <div class="mainbody"> | ||
| − | + | First, we cultured the bacteria overnight and adjusted them to the same OD600. We ultrasonic broken, centrifuged and respectively resuspend precipitation to measure the distribution of GFP in E.coli DH5α carrying BBa_J364000 and E.coli DH5α carrying BBa_K3034007. | |
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="picture"> | <div class="picture"> | ||
| Line 58: | Line 59: | ||
<div class="mainbody"> | <div class="mainbody"> | ||
| − | The results showed that both precipitation and supernatant contained relatively strong GFP | + | The results showed that both precipitation and supernatant contained relatively strong GFP. Moreover, the distribution of GFP in E.coli DH5α carrying BBa_K3034007 was not significantly different from that in E.coli DH5α carrying BBa_J364000. There are some differences with our expectation, after analysis, it may be caused by incomplete ultrasonic broken of bacteria. |
| − | + | </div><br> | |
<div class="mainbody"> | <div class="mainbody"> | ||
| − | Since the | + | Since the E.coli DH5α carrying BBa_K3034007 expressed GFP, this indirectly indicated that INPNC was successfully expressed. However, the content of GFP in the E.coli DH5α precipitate (cell membrane) carrying BBa_K3034007 was not significantly higher than the E.coli DH5α carrying BBa_J364000. We hypothesized that INPNC was expressed but the efficiency was not so high. |
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 72: | Line 73: | ||
<div class="mainbody"> | <div class="mainbody"> | ||
| − | Next, | + | Next, we used fluorescence microscopy to see if the INPNC worked. E.coli DH5α carrying BBa_J364000 (GFP) was rod-shaped and the fluorescence was equably distributed in E.coli (Fig. 2a). The fluorescence of E.coli DH5α carrying BBa_K3034007 (INPNC+GFP) was observed to be dotted and dispersed on the surface of E.coli (Fig. 2b,2c). The results proved that GFP has apparently been anchored to the surface of the E.coli and INPNC was working. |
</div> | </div> | ||
| − | + | <div class="mainbody"> | |
| + | In addition, we also noticed that E.coli DH5α carrying BBa_K3034007 (INPNC+GFP) had fluorescence aggregation on one side of the E.coli surface (Fig. 2c). The result is consistant with fact that we found in the literature[2] that the INPNC forms aggregates in the cell membrane. Thus, we are more clear that we have achieved our improvement. </div> | ||
| + | |||
<div class="picture"> | <div class="picture"> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2019/d/da/T--UESTC-China--Improve_2.png" alt="2" width="90%"> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2019/d/da/T--UESTC-China--Improve_2.png" alt="2" width="90%"> | ||
| Line 82: | Line 85: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 96: | Line 96: | ||
<div class="mainbody"> | <div class="mainbody"> | ||
| − | + | 1.We improved this part (BBa_J364000). Realize the expression of GFP on the surface of E.coli. <br> | |
| + | 2.Based on the current results, there is room for further improvement in the efficiency of system expression (The activity of INPNC needs to be improved).<br> | ||
| + | 3.Other teams who have the need of surface display can insert their target gene into this system. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 105: | Line 107: | ||
<div class="bigtitle" id="title_5">References</div> | <div class="bigtitle" id="title_5">References</div> | ||
<div class="mainbody"> | <div class="mainbody"> | ||
| − | [1] | + | [1] Li mingya, & Lin chenshui. (2016). Ice crystal nuclear protein and its application in bacterial surface display technology. Amino acids and biological resources, 38(2), 7-11. <br> |
| − | [2] | + | [2] Qiu, Y., Hudait, A., & Molinero, V. (2019). How Size and Aggregation of Ice-Binding Proteins Control Their Ice Nucleation Efficiency. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 141(18), 7439-7452. |
| − | </div> | + | </div> |
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Revision as of 14:45, 20 October 2019
Overview
This year, we improved this reporter device (BBa_J364000) into a surface display system (BBa_K3034007) by fusing GFP with INPNC. The improved system can anchor the downstream protein of INPNC to the surface of bacteria, while the GFP is used as the reporter gene. So, other teams who have the need of surface display can insert their target gene into this system.
Ice nucleation protein (INP) is a secretory outer membrane protein from Pseudomomas syringae, P.flurorescens and several other Gram-negative bacteria. INP can anchor one or more "passenger proteins" to the outer membrane of bacteria. The fixation of exogenous proteins on the bacteria surface through INPNC can not only greatly improve the efficiency of enzymatic reaction, but also avoid the degradation of exogenous proteins by intracellular enzymes of host cells[1].
Besides, we added a segment of linker between inpnc and gfp to ensure that two adjacent domains do not sterically interfere with one another.
Quantitative detection of fluorescence
First, we cultured the bacteria overnight and adjusted them to the same OD600. We ultrasonic broken, centrifuged and respectively resuspend precipitation to measure the distribution of GFP in E.coli DH5α carrying BBa_J364000 and E.coli DH5α carrying BBa_K3034007.
Fig.1. The relative fluorescence intensity of E.coli DH5α carrying BBa_J364000 and E.coli DH5α carrying BBa_K3034007. The relative fluorescence intensity= Fluorescence of precipitation/ (Fluorescence of supernatant+ Fluorescence of precipitation)×100%
The results showed that both precipitation and supernatant contained relatively strong GFP. Moreover, the distribution of GFP in E.coli DH5α carrying BBa_K3034007 was not significantly different from that in E.coli DH5α carrying BBa_J364000. There are some differences with our expectation, after analysis, it may be caused by incomplete ultrasonic broken of bacteria.
Since the E.coli DH5α carrying BBa_K3034007 expressed GFP, this indirectly indicated that INPNC was successfully expressed. However, the content of GFP in the E.coli DH5α precipitate (cell membrane) carrying BBa_K3034007 was not significantly higher than the E.coli DH5α carrying BBa_J364000. We hypothesized that INPNC was expressed but the efficiency was not so high.
Microscopic observation
Next, we used fluorescence microscopy to see if the INPNC worked. E.coli DH5α carrying BBa_J364000 (GFP) was rod-shaped and the fluorescence was equably distributed in E.coli (Fig. 2a). The fluorescence of E.coli DH5α carrying BBa_K3034007 (INPNC+GFP) was observed to be dotted and dispersed on the surface of E.coli (Fig. 2b,2c). The results proved that GFP has apparently been anchored to the surface of the E.coli and INPNC was working.
In addition, we also noticed that E.coli DH5α carrying BBa_K3034007 (INPNC+GFP) had fluorescence aggregation on one side of the E.coli surface (Fig. 2c). The result is consistant with fact that we found in the literature[2] that the INPNC forms aggregates in the cell membrane. Thus, we are more clear that we have achieved our improvement.
Fig.2. The fluorescence microscopy of E.coli DH5α carrying BBa_J364000(a) and E.coli DH5α carrying BBa_K3034007 (b、c).
Conclusions
1.We improved this part (BBa_J364000). Realize the expression of GFP on the surface of E.coli.
2.Based on the current results, there is room for further improvement in the efficiency of system expression (The activity of INPNC needs to be improved).
3.Other teams who have the need of surface display can insert their target gene into this system.
2.Based on the current results, there is room for further improvement in the efficiency of system expression (The activity of INPNC needs to be improved).
3.Other teams who have the need of surface display can insert their target gene into this system.
References
[1] Li mingya, & Lin chenshui. (2016). Ice crystal nuclear protein and its application in bacterial surface display technology. Amino acids and biological resources, 38(2), 7-11.
[2] Qiu, Y., Hudait, A., & Molinero, V. (2019). How Size and Aggregation of Ice-Binding Proteins Control Their Ice Nucleation Efficiency. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 141(18), 7439-7452.
[2] Qiu, Y., Hudait, A., & Molinero, V. (2019). How Size and Aggregation of Ice-Binding Proteins Control Their Ice Nucleation Efficiency. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 141(18), 7439-7452.