Collaborations with other Teams
Freiburg
Since "The Real MVP" is a modular system for Virus-like particles (VLPs), it can be used for many different applications. One of them could be drug delivery. iGEM team Freiburg was interested in this application in particular and therefore we collaborated with them. They have developed an anti-toxin which should be used to bind the corresponding toxin and thereby neutralize it. To deliver the anti-toxin to the neutrophil cells, which should perform the described neutralization, they were interested to use our VLPs. As a proof of concept regarding drug delivery, the iGEM team Freiburg generated human embryonic kidney (HEK) cells with a receptor (FPR2) on their surface. We sent them our VLPs which were modified with a protein (FLIPr) that targets the FPR2. Team Freiburg wanted to perform an assay, where the modified VLPs target the FPR2 of these HEK cells.
We aimed for a modular VLP-based platform (MVP) that could be used for many applications. Since we
decided on drug delivery as one of these
potential applications, we collaborated with the iGEM
Freiburg team. They developed a peptide via phage display that inhibits a toxin from
S. aureus. According to iGEM Freiburg, neutrophil cells migrate to this toxin, as in
a common inflammatory reaction and present a N-formyl peptide receptor 2 (FPR2) on the surface,
which does not result in endocytosis
[1,
2]. We aimed to modify our VLPs with formyl
peptide receptor-like 1 inhibitor (FLIPr) and the anti-toxin peptide from iGEM Freiburg. FLIPr
targets formyl peptide receptor-like 1 (FPLR1) but at higher concentrations also the FPR2 of the
neutrophil cells
[1,
3]. Therefore, a drug delivery system is needed. This way the
anti-toxin peptide could be delivered to the toxin and it could be inhibited as shown in
Fig. 1.
The VLPs could be modified with FLIPr and the anti-toxin and would thereby target the FPR2 on the surface of the neutrophil cells. The neutrophil cells migrate to the toxin from S. aureus. After the binding of VLPs to the cells, the toxin is inhibited by the anti-toxin on the VLPs.
As a first step of this drug delivery system, we wanted to modify our VLPs with FLIPr as shown in
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2 shows the modification of VLPs already loaded with Superfolder Green Fluorescent Protein
(sfGFP). The VLPs have got a
LPETGG-tag on their surface. The FLIPr proteins contain a polyG-tag. Due to these tags, sortase
can modify the surface of the VLPs with FLIPr.
As a proof of concept, the iGEM Freiburg team generated
human embryonic kidney (HEK) cells with FPR2 on their surface. They wanted to
perform an assay, where the modified VLPs target the FPR2 of these HEK cells. This schematic
procedure is shown below in Fig. 3.
Fig. 3 shows the schematic procedure of the targeting of FPR2 on the surface of the HEK
cells by our modified VLPs. The particles are modified at the surface with FLIPr and loaded with sfGFP
to investigate the successful interaction via microscopy.
After the targeting assay, the HEK cells should be screened via fluorescence-activated cell
sorting (FACS) and sorted into targeted and untargeted HEKs. This screening procedure is shown in
Fig. 4 below.
Fig. 4 shows the schematic procedure of the FACS, how the VLP targeted and untargeted HEK cells would be differentiated. The HEK cells are aligned so that ideally, they flow through the laser beam one cell at a time. The scattered light is characteristic to the cells and their components. The HEK cells are labelled with the fluorescent VLPs so that light is absorbed at first and then emitted in a band of wavelengths. The detector system converts the measurements of forward-scattered light (FSC) and side-scattered light (SSC) as well as specific fluorescence signals into digital signals that are processed by a computer. Afterwards, the HEK cells are sorted into targeted and untargeted cells to identify the targeted population and proove the drug delivery with the modified VLPs.
As a first step of the collaboration with the iGEM team Freiburg, we succesfully cloned mbp-flipr via gibson assembly into pACYCT2 backbone. Afterwards, we verified the success of our cloning via sequencing of the generated plasmid. With a not mutated plasmid of mbp-flipr we transformed E. coli Top10 and BL21 (DE3) cells and generated glycerol stocks. The iGEM team Freiburg transfected their HEK cells with FPR2. Due to time issues it was not possible to generated any further data. The next step to achieve a targeted drug delivery would be a successful purification of MBP-FLIPr and a proof of the same with a SDS-PAGE. Afterwards our VLPs would have to be modified with FLIPr and the iGEM team Freiburg would have to verify the drug delivery by FACS.
Bielefeld
The iGEM team of Bielefeld contacted us for a possible
collaboration regarding the standardization of fluorescence
data which is generated under the most varied conditions.
Standardization of GFP measurements was achieved during the
InterLab study of the last years. This year, Bielefeld wanted
to establish a standard for mCherry. Therefore, Texas Red was
chosen as a reference.
As we planned on using mCherry in our project anyways, we
considered this collaboration as fitting. We used Texas Red, which
team Bielefeld kindly provided us with, to create a dilution
series. We also took a measurement of mCherry, which we planned on using
to modify our VLPs via the sortase reaction at first, to then be
standardized using the Texas Red data generated by us and
probably many other teams. Thanks to team Bielefeld for
organizing the standardization of a fluorescent protein other
than GFP.
Duesseldorf
For several years now we have designed postcards and sent them
to Duesseldorf. Every year their team collects numerous
postcards from many iGEM teams around the world and then send
a postcard of each team back to everyone who participates.
Each time it brings a lot of fun to see what designs the other
teams have come up with.
Thank you Duesseldorf for keeping up this collaboration every
year. We can only imagine how time consuming the organization
of this collaboration is. But it is always a great opportunity
to learn something about the other projects and to get in
contact with teams from all around the world. Keep up the
tradition for years to come, as again it was a pleasure for
us.
Marburg
iGEM Marburg
tried to make all of our lives easier this year. They worked
on a colony picking bot on the basis of the
Opentrons OT-2. In order to achieve their goal, they needed as much help
from the iGEM community as possible.
Therefore, they were asking other teams to send pictures of
agar plates with colonies on them, which they needed to train
the artificial intelligence. We gave our best to send iGEM
Marburg as many pictures as possible and we even sent in the
second most pictures from all participating teams. Hope we
could help you, iGEM Marburg.
Stuttgart
iGEM Team Stuttgart contacted us for a
collaboration. The aim was the establishment of a medium based on algae. This
medium was supposed to be more sustainable and used for cultivation of bacteria instead of conventional
media.
We received three different kinds of media and tested them by generating growth curves. For recording of
the growth curves, we used E. coli BL21 (DE3). Every 45 minutes over a time span of 7.5 hours the
OD600 was measured. Subsequently, the three curves were plotted and sent to team Stuttgart.
They collected the results from all participating teams to make sense of all the generated data. We are
excited to see whether any of the provided media will replace conventional media in the future.
Meetups
2019 seemed to be the year of iGEM Meetups. iGEM TU Darmstadt
participated in iGEM Spring Festival (Bonn, May),
iGEM meetup for teams and supervisor (The Hague, June),
German iGEM Meetup (Duesseldorf, July) and
InParis European Meetup (Paris, July). The meetups
provided some good opportunities to exchange ideas, get to know
other teams and their projects, find collaborating partners
during numerous poster sessions and also enjoy expert
talks.
Besides getting in contact with other teams, the meetups
always are a great opportunity to obtain feedback from other
scientists and to prepare for the presentation and the poster
sessions in Boston at the end of the year. Meetups are also
useful to receive suggestions for improvement of the project.
Therefore, we would like to thank iGEM team Bonn, Rathenau and RIVM,
iGEM team Duesseldorf and Pasteur Paris, Ionis Paris, GO Paris
Saclay and Evry Paris Saclay iGEM teams for the great
organization of those events. We really enjoyed to participate
and to get to know many of the other iGEM teams from around
Europe.
Collaborations outside of the iGEM community
Lab3
The open community Lab3 is a non-profit organization which was founded in 2015 and is located in Darmstadt. The vision of the community is to build up open laboratories and workshops, where everyone can realize their own research in the fields of electronics, engineering and life sciences. Currently, the community consists of an electronical laboratory, a workshop room and a creative laboratory. The laboratories are equipped with soldering tools, a cnc machine, a laser cutter, several 3D-printers and personal computers with CAD (computer aided design) and CAM (computer aided manufacturing) software. This year, our iGEM team engaged a collaboration to develop parts for the bioreactor and also set up a server cluster from the scratch for our modeling.
For our computational expensive modeling we were looking for a way to
cover the time necessary for computing at an early stage. Together with the Lab3 we worked on setting
up a sever cluster (see Fig. 1 and Fig. 2).
For the construction of the server cluster we decided to use seven Supermicro nodes with 24 cores and 64 GB RAM each.
These nodes where connected with a network switch to a master server which manages the
infrastructure. On the server cluster we ran the Linux distribution Ubuntu with the modeling tools
Rosetta, GROMACS and TensorFlow. To accelerate our calculations in the fields of machine learning and molecular dynamics, we
used a special server with Nvidia GTX 760 graphic cards.
Machine learning approaches are very common today. We used this technology for the 3D-Structure
prediction of our Sortase A7M. In the project the software tool GROMACS was
used to validate the stability of the computed sortases. You can see the results on the Modeling Page.
The 3D-printing room of the Lab3 was a nice playground to learn a lot about printing technologies. We designed several parts for the bioreactor and printed them with fused deposition modeling (FDM) printer Prusa MK3. In this very popular printing technology, a thermoplastic filament gets molten in a hotend and the liquefied material gets build up on a platform, layer per layer. With this technique we were also able to create some new wide combs for the agarose gel extraction, which we needed in our wetlab (see Fig. 3). Aside this technology we also printed the combs and other stuff with a Multi Jet Modeling printer from Stratasys. This printer works with a photopolymer, which makes the printer very precise. In Fig. 3 you can see a printed comb with the Multi Jet Modeling printer. In order to support our public engagement we designed a 3D-model of a Virus-like particle (VLP) (see Fig. 4). With this we were able to visualize the structure of VLPs and explain our idea of a modular platform.
Over the summer, the team members involved with the Tech project part was able to work in the laboratories of the Lab3 community. By means of the lab's tools we built up the OD600-sensor. The syringe pumps meant for induction were printed with the FDM 3D-printers. We also used the solder stations to manufacture printed circuit boards (PCBs) for the control of the SensorBricks. The bricks where manufactured with a milling machine and a drill. See more at the Tech page.
Paul-Ehrlich-Institut (PEI)
While working on our project, we talked to several
experts. One of them was Dr. Stefan Schülke who works at
Paul-Ehrlich-Institut (PEI)
in Langen, Germany. PEI is a federal institute which works on the
approval of different drugs (e.g.: vaccines, allergens for therapy,
drugs for gene therapy, and many more).
Dr. Schülke is part of a group which focuses on the research field
of molecular allergology. While
talking to Dr. Schülke, who also teaches at TU Darmstadt, he offered that we could
analyze our product at the PEI. He also worked with Virus-like particles (VLPs) before and therefore was able to give us some valuable input
for the project concerning the immunogenicity of our Modular Virus-like particles (MVPs). Together with a former iGEM TU
Darmstadt member,
Alexandra Goretzki, we
performed the
experiments. You can read more about this here.
References
- ↑ Postma, B., et al., Chemotaxis Inhibitory Protein of Staphylococcus aureus Binds Specifically to the C5a and Formylated Peptide Receptor. The Journal of Immunology, 2004, 172 (11) 6994-7001. [1]
- ↑ Stemerding, A. M., et al., Staphylococcus aureus formyl peptide receptor-like 1 inhibitor (FLIPr) and its homologue FLIPr-like are potent FcγR antagonists that inhibit IgG-mediated effector functions. The Journal of Immunology, 2013, 191: p. 353-362. [2]
- ↑ Prat, C., et al., A New Staphylococcal Anti-Inflammatory Protein That Antagonizes the Formyl Peptide Receptor-Like 1. The Journal of Immunology, 2006. 177: p. 8017-80262018. [3]