Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
<h2>Overview - The Model</h2> | <h2>Overview - The Model</h2> | ||
− | <p>Many variables play a role in the behavior of synthetic circuits. Many (if not all) of these variables can dramatically change when transferring a circuit between organisms. We adopted a system developed by <cite><a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/nbt.4111"><i>Sontag et al. (2018)</i></a></cite> which has been shown to result in independence of copy number of the genetic circuit. However, the full potential of this system has not been explored yet. Closer analyzation of this system revealed it would maintain the same output when transferring genetic circuits between organisms. <br> <br> | + | <p>Many variables play a role in the behavior of synthetic circuits. Many (if not all) of these variables can dramatically change when transferring a circuit between organisms. We adopted a system developed by <cite><a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/nbt.4111"><i>(Sontag et al. (2018))</i></a></cite> which has been shown to result in independence of copy number of the genetic circuit. However, the full potential of this system has not been explored yet. Closer analyzation of this system revealed it would maintain the same output when transferring genetic circuits between organisms. <br> <br> |
− | In our system we exploit a commonly applied control system motif known as an Incoherent Feed-Forward Loop (iFFL), in which an input signal regulates both the activator and the respressor of the output of the system. An iFFL results in perfect adaptation when the negative regulation is uncooperative <cite><a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/nbt.4111"><i>Sontag et al. (2018)</i></a></cite>. <br> | + | In our system we exploit a commonly applied control system motif known as an Incoherent Feed-Forward Loop (iFFL), in which an input signal regulates both the activator and the respressor of the output of the system. An iFFL results in perfect adaptation when the negative regulation is uncooperative <cite><a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/nbt.4111"><i>(Sontag et al. (2018))</i></a></cite>. <br> |
The input in our case is the copy number of the DNA template and the output is the steady-state expression of a gene of interest. This control system is established through the expression of a Transcription activator-like effector (TALE) protein. TALE proteins recognize DNA by a simple DNA-binding mechanism and have been shown to bind fully uncooperative (source). The TALE protein has been engineered to bind to the promoter of a gene of interest and thus repress the expression of it. <br> | The input in our case is the copy number of the DNA template and the output is the steady-state expression of a gene of interest. This control system is established through the expression of a Transcription activator-like effector (TALE) protein. TALE proteins recognize DNA by a simple DNA-binding mechanism and have been shown to bind fully uncooperative (source). The TALE protein has been engineered to bind to the promoter of a gene of interest and thus repress the expression of it. <br> | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
Line 91: | Line 91: | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2019/8/85/T--TUDelft--TALE_system.png" style="width:50%" | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2019/8/85/T--TUDelft--TALE_system.png" style="width:50%" | ||
alt="TALE system"> | alt="TALE system"> | ||
− | <figcaption>Figure 2: Scheme of genetic circuit interactions developed by <cite><a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/nbt.4111"><i>Sontag et al. (2018)</i></a></cite></figcaption> | + | <figcaption>Figure 2: Scheme of genetic circuit interactions developed by <cite><a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/nbt.4111"><i>(Sontag et al. (2018))</i></a></cite></figcaption> |
</figure> | </figure> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
Line 175: | Line 175: | ||
<h3>Copy number independence</h3> | <h3>Copy number independence</h3> | ||
− | <p>Broad host range plasmids are often used when using different hosts however, they do not guarantee the same copy number in every organism <cite><a href="https://academic.oup.com/femsle/article/348/2/87/731695"><i>Jain and Srivastava 2013</i></a></cite>. In some organisms, it is not common practice to use a plasmid but rather insert into the genome. The need for consistent expression at a wide range of copy number is thus a desirable feature of any synthetic circuit. We, therefore, have simulated this system from a range of 1 to 600 (genome integration to high-copy number plasmid). </p> | + | <p>Broad host range plasmids are often used when using different hosts however, they do not guarantee the same copy number in every organism <cite><a href="https://academic.oup.com/femsle/article/348/2/87/731695"><i>(Jain and Srivastava 2013)</i></a></cite>. In some organisms, it is not common practice to use a plasmid but rather insert into the genome. The need for consistent expression at a wide range of copy number is thus a desirable feature of any synthetic circuit. We, therefore, have simulated this system from a range of 1 to 600 (genome integration to high-copy number plasmid). </p> |
<figure> | <figure> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2019/8/86/T--TUDelft--copynumber_simulation2.png" width="800" height="600" | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2019/8/86/T--TUDelft--copynumber_simulation2.png" width="800" height="600" | ||
Line 219: | Line 219: | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
− | + | In our system we are using the same promoter for each gene and thus assume similar variation in transcription for each gene when changing between organisms. However, even though we use the same ribosome binding site (RBS) for each gene, we can't assume similar variation in translation rate. Translation rate is dependent both on translation initiation and translation elongation. Translation elongation is largely dependent on codon usage <cite><a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719375115"><i>(Frumkin, Lajoie et al. 2018)</i></a></cite>. Both genes in our circuit don't have the same codon adaptation index in E. <i>coli</i> and their adaptation will be irregular to different bacterial species. | |
<ul> | <ul> | ||
<li> | <li> |
Latest revision as of 09:45, 27 September 2019
![Protocol Experiments](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2019/3/3b/T--TUDelft--ModelingRK_logo.png)
Overview - The Model
Many variables play a role in the behavior of synthetic circuits. Many (if not all) of these variables can dramatically change when transferring a circuit between organisms. We adopted a system developed by (Sontag et al. (2018)) which has been shown to result in independence of copy number of the genetic circuit. However, the full potential of this system has not been explored yet. Closer analyzation of this system revealed it would maintain the same output when transferring genetic circuits between organisms.
In our system we exploit a commonly applied control system motif known as an Incoherent Feed-Forward Loop (iFFL), in which an input signal regulates both the activator and the respressor of the output of the system. An iFFL results in perfect adaptation when the negative regulation is uncooperative (Sontag et al. (2018)).
The input in our case is the copy number of the DNA template and the output is the steady-state expression of a gene of interest. This control system is established through the expression of a Transcription activator-like effector (TALE) protein. TALE proteins recognize DNA by a simple DNA-binding mechanism and have been shown to bind fully uncooperative (source). The TALE protein has been engineered to bind to the promoter of a gene of interest and thus repress the expression of it.
![iFFL](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2019/5/5a/T--TUDelft--iFFL.png)
The kinetics
In order to model our system we have to identify all interactions and subsequently define the rate equations. Figure 2 depicts a scheme of all interactions.
![TALE system](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2019/8/85/T--TUDelft--TALE_system.png)
From these interactions we can derive the following system of ordinary differential equations:
Parameter | Explanation |
---|---|
$a_T$ | Transcription rate TALE |
c | copy number plasmid |
$y_m$ | degradation rate mRNA |
$b_T$ | Translation rate TALE |
$y_T$ | Degradation rate TALE |
n | Cooperativity of binding |
$k_{on} /k_{off}$ | (un)Binding of TALE to promoter |
$a_{Gmax}/a_{Gmin}$ | Maximum and minimum transcription of GFP |
$b_G$ | Translation rate GFP |
$y_G$ | Degradation rate GFP |
Simplification of the system
This system can be simplified by making a few assumptions:
- Amount of TALE protein is much larger than binding sites for TALE
- TALE binding and unbinding occurs much more rapidly than protein production and degradation
- There is negligable expression when the promoter is repressed
$G = (\frac{c}{c^n}) (\frac{a_Gb_Gy_T^ny_m^n}{a_Tb_Ty_Gy_m})$
In the case of $n = 1$, this system is independent of copy number. However, maybe more notably the system also appears to be dependent only on the ratios of the remaining variables. The dependence on the ratio of these variables has not been previously explored. This dependency on the ratio of only a few variables will be further elaborated in the section "Sensitivity to different environments" (maybe put a link so someone automatically scrolls to this section?).
Copy number independence
Broad host range plasmids are often used when using different hosts however, they do not guarantee the same copy number in every organism (Jain and Srivastava 2013). In some organisms, it is not common practice to use a plasmid but rather insert into the genome. The need for consistent expression at a wide range of copy number is thus a desirable feature of any synthetic circuit. We, therefore, have simulated this system from a range of 1 to 600 (genome integration to high-copy number plasmid).
![TALE system](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2019/8/86/T--TUDelft--copynumber_simulation2.png)
As predicted by our model simplification the system has no variation in steady-state protein levels.
-
Link to wet lab
To validate our predictions we have
Sensitivity to different environments
As stated before, there are many variables that influence the expression of a gene of interest. However, according to the steady-state model solution, the final level of the gene of interest is only dependent on the ratio of transcription, translation and degradation rates. We can use this to ensure stable expression across different bacterial species if we make the following assumptions:- Transcription rates will change in a similar way for both the TALE gene as the gene of interest.
- Translation initiation rate will change in a similar way for both the TALE gene as the gene of interest if the same ribosome binding site is used for both.
- Translation elongation rate will change in a similar way for both the TALE gene as the gene of interest if both proteins are similarly codon-optimized.
-
Validation of steady-state solution - Simulation of transcription and translation variations using full model
Our steady-state solution is based off of a couple of assumptions. We therefore simulate our full model in the case of transcription and translation variation to see whether we get the same result: