Problem
With almost no foreknowledge about microalgae cultivation and growth, we talked to several experts on
this topic (Prof. Dr. Arnd G. Heyer, Vitor Verdelho, Luft and PD Dr. Michael Schweikert) helping us to
implement the cultivation of Chlorella vulgaris and Chlorella sorokiniana in our lab.
Although cultivation of the microalgae was with a constant setup (16:8 hours of illumination, constant
gassing and mixing) the growth curve (measurement of optical density (OD)) of the microalgae exhibited
several discrepancies compared to our expected growth curve. As an example, the growth of the algae was
different for each day, sometimes exhibiting an exponential growth, sometimes a linear or stagnating
growth. With our fear that constantly varying growth behavior might cause different compositions of our
algae extract we were keen on fixing the growth behavior of the microalgae in order to obtain a
constant, non-changing growth rate.
The role of MicroBiolytics
We reached out to MicroBiolytics, a local company offering quality control services for the food and
pharmaceutical industry. The CEO of the company (Andreas Wolf) was very interested in our project,
especially the idea to develop an eco-friendlier process. We set up a meeting with Andreas in which we
told him about our iGEM project, whereas he explained us what MicroBiolytics offers. In short,
MicroBiolytics analyzes fluids using infrared-spectroscopy, being able to analyze the changes of
compounds in the fluid. With the inconsistent algae growth in mind we came to the conclusion that we
could detect and measure the changes in the growth medium helping us understand the algae growth.
Therefore, we collected daily samples of the airlift bioreactor in which we cultivated our algae and
noted the corresponding OD at 750 nm. With the captured OD we can deduce on which day the algae exhibit
stagnating growth and link that to the liquid in the reactor by analyzing the collected sample.
Furthermore, we were offered to analyze our algae extraction batches for purity and differences in
compounds.
After the meeting, we collected the airlift samples over the next 2 weeks and brought them to
MicroBiolytics. We were then explained the analyzation method and were able to use their device for
measurements. Afterwards, we were explained how they deduce the relevant data from the huge data sets
which accumulate for infrared spectroscopy and how to interpret the results.
Results
Samples were taken according to the following scheme.
Table 1: Scheme of samples which were taken for the measurement by Micro Biolytics GmbH. The medium
sample served as control. Two samples with each 500 µL were used for the measurement
and two samples were taken for the determination of the pH-value.
Date
|
OD at 750
|
Sample
|
Sample ID
|
Sample ID pH determination
|
-
|
0
|
DSN Media
|
C1
|
-
|
-
|
C2
|
-
|
10.02.2019
|
0.74
|
Reactor Sample
|
A1
|
B1
|
A2
|
B2
|
10.03.2019
|
0.71
|
Reactor Sample
|
A3
|
B3
|
A4
|
B4
|
10.04.2019
|
0.76
|
Reactor Sample
|
A5
|
B5
|
A6
|
B6
|
10.07.2019
|
0.77
|
Reactor Sample
|
A7
|
B7
|
A8
|
B8
|
10.07.2019
|
0.73
|
Reactor Sample
|
A9
|
B9
|
A10
|
B10
|
10.09.2019
|
0.89
|
Reactor Sample
|
A11
|
B11
|
A12
|
B12
|
10.10.2019
|
0.92
|
Reactor Sample
|
A13
|
B13
|
A14
|
B14
|
10.11.2019
|
1.02
|
Reactor Sample
|
A15
|
B15
|
A16
|
B16
|
10.14.2019
|
1.2
|
Reactor Sample
|
A17
|
B17
|
A18
|
B18
|
On each date four samples were taken from the reactor. Two are used for the measurement and two for pH
determination. Two additional samples C1 DSNA1 and C2 DSNA2 were taken as control for the analysis of
composition. We also calculated the concentrations of each supplement of the DSN media which was used
for the
Chlorella sorokiniana cultivation as additional information for Micro Biolytics GmbH. The
concentrations are shown in the following table.
Table 2: Concentrations of components in the DSN media which was used for Chlorella
cultivation.
Component of DSN media
|
Concentration [g/L]
|
Sea salt
|
3.5
|
KNO3
|
0.5
|
MgSO4xH2O
|
1.38
|
CaCl2
|
0.56
|
MnCl2x4H2O
|
0.0002
|
ZnSO4x7H2O
|
0.00005
|
CoSO4x7H2O
|
0.00005
|
Na2MoO4x2H2O
|
0.00005
|
CuSO4x5H2O
|
0.000005
|
Na2EDTA
|
0.000044
|
FeCL3x6H2O
|
0.000032
|
K2HPO4
|
0.0005
|
Micro Biolytics GmbH presented and explained our results. Each sample was measured 3 times. They did a
quantitative analysis of known spectra from a database on our samples.
In the following figure the concentrations of sulfate are shown for each sample.
Figure 1: Concentrations of sulfate in samples taken on a certain date. The dotted line indicates the
calculated concentration of sulfate in the DSN medium. C1 and C2 represent the real concentrations of
sulfate in the DSN medium.
It is notable that the sulfate concentration in the reactor is constantly increasing over the process time except
for sample A01 and A02. This could be due to the evaporation of the medium during cultivation. Sulfate may have accumulated.
Figure 2 shows the nitrate concentration of each sample.
Figure 2: Concentrations of nitrate in samples taken on a certain date. The dotted line indicates the
calculated concentration of nitrate in the DSN medium. C1 and C2 represent the real concentrations of
nitrate in the DSN medium.
In figure 2 the real nitrate concentration (C1 and C2) seems to perfectly match the calculated
concentrations of nitrate. The nitrate concentration in the samples A01 and A02 diverge from the other
samples A03 to A08. Concentrations in A03 to A08 are quite similar to each other. On the contrary ample A09 to A18 show
concertations of almost 58 g/L. This can be explained by the
fact, that 3-4 L of DSN medium was added on this date.
The concentration of sodium chloride in our samples are shown in the figure 3.
Figure 3: Concentrations of sodium chloride in samples taken on a certain date. The dotted line indicates the
calculated concentration of sodium chloride in the DSN medium. C1 and C2 represent the real
concentrations of sodium chloride in the DSN medium.
It is noteworthy that sodium chloride concentrations in all samples are much lower than they should be
according to the recipe of the DSN medium. The increasing concentration of sodium chloride over the sampling
time can be explained by the addition of DSN medium.
Phosphate was not detected in any samples.
Conclusion
The measurement of the media composition in our reactor, allowed us to deduce important information
for future algae cultivation: As can be seen in figure 2 and figure 3, addition of new media resulted
in detection of microalgae growth (A09). The measurements generated significant differences in nitrate
concentrations among in the samples. For this reason, we tested, if weekly supplementation with nitrate
would result in a constant growth.
With this in mind, we exemplary tested weekly nitrate supplementation for the next two weeks. Indeed,
additional nitrate supplementation was able to stabilize algae growth. This was shown by daily
OD measurements, where no stagnant growth was detected (Figure 4).
Figure 4: Growth curve of Chlorella vulgaris after supplementation of nitrate determined by
optical density measurements at 750 nm.
As can be seen in figure 3, our cultivation medium (DSN) did not contain the required sodium chloride
concentrations according to the recipe. For this reason, we created a new batch of DSN medium (40 L).
Thanks to the weekly nitrate supplementation we were able to stabilize growth of the microalgae,
thereby increasing our biomass yield. Furthermore, we decided to refill new medium weekly.
Micro Biolytics GmbH enabled us to perform theses analyses. Thanks to their support we were able to
optimize the cultivation and the necessary media composition.