This part perfectly shows the potential of a RNA-based AND logic, as described in the paper
by Green et al. (Nature, 2017). Furthermore, it shows the possibilities you have with RNA
based logic circuits and how innovative they are. This gate is a toehold switch system with which a gene of interest can be regulated on a
translational level using mRNA as regulator. After transcription, the mRNA of this gate forms
a hairpin that hides the ribosome binding site and start codon of the gene of interest, thus
translation cannot be initiated (Figure 1B). A complementary part to the gate (trigger) is
needed to open the hairpin and release the ribosome binding site. In this case two triggers
are needed that form a trigger complex to open the gate (BBa_K2970000 and
BBa_K2970001). Figure 1A shows a scheme of the trigger complex. The affinity between the
trigger complex and the gate is greater than that of the gate to itself (in the hairpin). A single
trigger cannot open the gate because it contains only half the required complementary
sequence. Figure 1: A) Formation of trigger complex after translation. B) mRNA of gate sequence forms
secondary structures that hide the ribosome binding site and start codon. Figure 2: Opening of the gate due to annealing of trigger complex to gate.To use this system in
bacteria we implemented the gate sequence together with a gene for chloramphenicol
(BBa_K2970011), flanked by a constitutive promoter (BBa_J23100) and a strong terminator
(BBa_B1002) into pSB1A3 where the ampicillin resistance can be cut out.
After transformation of both trigger plasmids (BBa_K2970003 and BBa_K2970004) and the
gate plasmid in one bacterium all three mRNA structures will be formed, the gate will open
up, and the translation of the chloramphenicol resistance can take place. Bacteria that took
all three plasmids are able to survive on media with chloramphenicol.
This part can be used together with both trigger compositions for triple transformation in
bacteria. Genes of interest that should be transformed together, can be put on the three
plasmids. Only if all three plasmids are taken by a bacterium the chloramphenicol resistance
is produced and the bacterium can survive on medium with chloramphenicol. Thus
chloramphenicol can be used to select bacteria that got all genes of interest. We tested the gate plasmid with our two trigger plasmids by performing simultaneous
transformations with these plasmids. After transformation we selected the bacteria by plating
on LB-agar plates with chloramphenicol. We compared the results with positive and negative
controls, using the empty pSB1C3 backbone and pSB1A3 respectively.
The result of the transformation with all three plasmids after selection with chloramphenicol is
shown in figure 3. Figure 3: E. coli cells transformed with three plasmids, the plasmid carrying the
gate, the plasmid carrying trigger one and the plasmid carrying trigger two. The
cells were plated on LB-agar plates with chloramphenicol, bacterial growth was
observed. Colonies grew on chloramphenicol plates after transformation with all three plasmids. This
shows that our RNA based logic circuit allows the expression of the antibiotic resistance. No
colonies grew on the plates with the negative control. Colonies also grew on the plates with
the positive control.
To further test the trigger and the gate, we performed transformations with each plasmid
individually. The results are shown in figure 4. Figure 4: Cell plated out on chloramphenicol agar plates. Left: cells transformed
with the gate plasmid. Middle: cells transformed with the trigger 1 plasmid. Right: cells
transformed with the trigger 2 plasmid. Unfortunately colonies also grew on the plates with just the individual transformation of the
gate plasmid, though the number of colonies was much lower when compared to the
transformation with all three plasmids. We sequenced the gate plasmid to confirm correct
assembly. The results showed no mutation in the gate sequence. We concluded that the
gate is showing signs of leakage, expressing the antibiotic resistance even in the absence of
triggers. This basal expression was rather strong due to the strong promoter we used for our
experiments. To measure the gates leakage, we observed cells transformed with all three plasmids on
plates with different chloramphenicol concentrations and compared them to cells transformed
with only the gate plasmid. As a positive control we used the pSB1C3 backbone. The Excel
file used for the calibration can be viewed here. The number of colonies per plate after twelve hours of
incubation is shown in figure 5. Figure 5: Number of colonies per plate depending on the chloramphenicol
concentration. E. coli DH5α cells were transformed with the gate plasmid (blue), the
gate plasmid together with both trigger plasmids (red), or with the control backbone
pSB1C3 (green). The colonies were counted after 12 hours. The data clearly shows that the gate is leaking, but when compared to the triple
transformation (red) and the control (green) the number of colonies when transformed with
only the gate plasmid was significantly lower. Additionally the number of colonies when
transformed with all three plasmids was larger than when transformed with the positive
control.
We also used a plate reader to measure the growth rate of cells that were transformed with
three different plasmids (pSB1A3, pSB1C3, pSB1K3 or BBa_K2970003, BBa_K2970004,
BBa_K2970006) and compared it to cells without any plasmids. The results are shown in
figure 6. Figure 6: Plate reader growth curves of E. coli DH5α. The generation time was
measured and calculated for non competent cells (orange), for cells transformed with the
backbones pSB1A3, pSB1C3 and pSC1K3.M1 (blue), and for cells transformed with our two
trigger plasmids together with the gate plasmid (green). Error bars show the standard
deviation. For cells transformed with three plasmids an impaired growth rate can be observed.
We could not show that the transformation of our three plasmids was less harmful to the
bacteria than the transformation with three different antibiotics, instead it shows comparable
levels of stress.
Due to the linker between the gate and our gene of interest (chloramphenicol acetyl
transferase) additional bases were attached to the gene which might affect the functionality
of the protein as it contained an additional 19 amino acids. To test the genes activity we
inserted the sequence containing the additional bases into pSB1A3, transformed it into
bacteria and plated the cells on chloramphenicol plates. The results of this experiment are
shown in figure 7. Figure 7: Test transformation to check chloramphenicol resistance gene. E. coli
DH5α cells were transformed with a test plasmid containing the modified
chloramphenicol resistance gene (A). For negative control (B) pSB1A3 was used. For
positive control (C) pSB1C3 was used. Several colonies grew on the plate with bacteria transformed with the modified
chloramphenicol acetyl transferase. The negative control showed no cell growth while on the
plate with the positive control a cell turf has grown. This confirms that the activity of the
chloramphenicol acetyl transferase was not significantly impaired by the additional amino acids. Descripition
BBA_K2970006
-Gate Composition
Results
All Composite Parts
Part
Part Name/Link to registry
Part Type
Components
Length (bp)
Trigger 1 Composition
BBa_K2970003
composite
part
BBa_J23100, BBa_K2970000, BBa_B1002
137
Trigger 2 Composition
BBa_K2970004
composite part
BBa_J23100, BBa_K2970001, BBa_B1002
137
Gate Composition
BBa_K2970006
composite part
BBa_J23102, BBa_K2970002, BBa_K2970011, BBa_B1002
840
Gate/Triggertest composition
BBa_K2970008
composite
part
BBa_J64997, BBa_K2970000, BBa_K731721, BBa_K206000, BBa_K2970001, BBa_B1002, BBa_J23100, BBa_K2970002, BBa_E0040, BBa_B1002
1266
J23100 Test Composition with RiboJ
BBa_K2970009
composite part
BBa_J23100,
BBa_K1679038,
BBa_E0240
989
J23102 Test Composition with RiboJ
BBa_K2970010
composite part
BBa_J23102,
BBa_K1679038,
BBa_E0240
989
J23100 Test
Composition
BBa_K2970012
composite part
BBa_J23100,
BBa_E0240
914
J23102 Test Composition
BBa_K2970013
composite part
BBa_J23102,
BBa_E0240
914