Difference between revisions of "Team:Costa Rica/Results"

Line 159: Line 159:
  
 
<p>Considering the intensity of the annotated bands in figure 1, which are only expressed in the intracellular proteins fraction, we hypothesize that our desire proteins are present in this fraction. Nevertheless, sequencing is necessary to confirm this argument.  
 
<p>Considering the intensity of the annotated bands in figure 1, which are only expressed in the intracellular proteins fraction, we hypothesize that our desire proteins are present in this fraction. Nevertheless, sequencing is necessary to confirm this argument.  
Additionally, to see if AIP is being transfer to the extracellular medium by AgrB, we analyzed the fraction with all extracellular proteins (Figure 4).  
+
Additionally, to see if AIP is being transfered to the extracellular medium by AgrB, we analyzed the fraction with all extracellular proteins (Figure 4).  
 
</p>
 
</p>
  
Line 172: Line 172:
 
                     </div>
 
                     </div>
  
<p>As seen above, extracellular fractions didn’t show any intense band related to our desired proteins, in contrast with the intracellular fraction. Because of that, we proposed modifications in our system and characterization in order to transfer AIP to the extracellular space.  
+
<p>As seen above, extracellular fractions didn’t show any intense bands related to our desired proteins, in contrast with the intracellular fraction. Therefore, we recommend modifications to our system and further characterization in order to transfer AIP to the extracellular space.  
 
</p>
 
</p>
  

Revision as of 06:15, 10 December 2019

Responsive image

The results shown here are product of our work in different laboratories of three universities: Costa Rica Institute of Technology (ITCR), National University of Costa Rica (UNA) and the University of Costa Rica (UCR). Each test was made in compliance to the security standards needed to work with each microorganism and reagent.

Responsive image

Endolysin CD27L1-179

CD27L1-179 is the catalytic domain of a bacteriophage endolysin that infects Clostridium difficile. It is homologous to the domain of the N-acetyl-muramoyl-L-alanine amidase. This truncation mutation was selected instead of the complete protein because, according to previous studies, it shows a faster lysis to different strains of the pathogen and a high level of selectivity against Clostridia compared to the complete protein (Mayer et al., 2011).

We designed a construct that expresses CD27L1-179 in the plasmid pTwist-Amp-High Copy. We used the T7 promoter for this construct due to its high transcription level and its general inactivation in the absence of IPTG. This promoter is commonly used in the strain selected, E. coli BL21(DE3). Also, the protein was tagged with 6 histidines in the C-terminal to facilitate its purification by affinity chromatography. Is worth to mention that, for our proposed solution, this lysin should be expressed in L.casei. However, as we were not able to transform Lactobacillus yet, we designed the aforementioned construct to express it in E.coli and test the protein activity.

The 6xHis-lysin is a soluble intracellular protein, therefore this fraction was the one used in the Ni-NTA resin purification. The protein of interest was eluted in 500 mM Imidazole. As shown in the next SDS-PAGE, considering the size of the band, we confirmed the presence of our purified protein in elution number 1 (F1).

Before lysis assays, the protein was dialyzed to remove Imidazole.

Lysis assay

The lysis activity of CD27L1-179 was tested on Clostridium difficile NCTC 13307, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus sp. and Salmonella abatetuba. The Kirby-Bauer method was used, bacterias were inoculated in a Mueller-Hinton agar, using different concentrations of lysin (0.12 mg/mL, 0.06 mg/mL and 0.03 mg/mL). Amoxicillin (AMX, 10 µg) and chloramphenicol (CHL, 30 µg) were used as positive controls and PBS as negative control. As shown in Figure 2, at these lysin concentrations, inhibitory halos were not observed. Thus, we concluded that this protein CD27L1-179 was not able to inhibit their growth in the conditions tested. Nevertheless, we keep working in the laboratory improving test conditions, such as lysin and zinc concentrations.

Auto Inducer Peptide

AIP is the Quorum Sensing signaling protein of C. difficile. Nevertheless, the pre signal protein (AgrD) suffers an unknown modification by AgrB and so, AIP’s sequence is still undiscovered. Therefore, we produced both proteins.

This proteins, AgrD and AgrB, have a pLac promoter to produce AIP only when IPTG is added. Also, a GFP reporter is coded polycistronically after the AgrD peptide, as a way to indirectly quantify AIP expression. Is important to note that nickel affinity chromatography isn't used as a purification and quantification method. This consideration was based on the previously reported insoluble properties of the peptide and the possible interference of a his tag during the processing of AgrD by AgrB.

As AgrB is a transmembrane protein (Zhang et al., 2002), GFP is reported as intracellular (Slade et al., 2009) and there’s a possibility that AIP is kept in the intracellular space, we first induced the bacterial culture, extracted intracellular proteins and analyzed them in a SDS PAGE (Figure 3).

Considering the intensity of the annotated bands in figure 1, which are only expressed in the intracellular proteins fraction, we hypothesize that our desire proteins are present in this fraction. Nevertheless, sequencing is necessary to confirm this argument. Additionally, to see if AIP is being transfered to the extracellular medium by AgrB, we analyzed the fraction with all extracellular proteins (Figure 4).

As seen above, extracellular fractions didn’t show any intense bands related to our desired proteins, in contrast with the intracellular fraction. Therefore, we recommend modifications to our system and further characterization in order to transfer AIP to the extracellular space.

References

Andino-Molina, M., Barquero-Calvo, E., Seyboldt, C., Schmoock, G., Neubauer, H., Tzoc, E., Rodríguez, C. & Quesada-Gómez, C. (2019). Multidrug-resistant Clostridium difficile ribotypes 078 and 014/5-FLI01 in piglets from Costa Rica. Anaerobe, 55, 78-82.

Mayer, M. J., Garefalaki, V., Spoerl, R., Narbad, A., & Meijers, R. (2011). Structure-based modification of a C. difficile-targeting endolysin affects activity and host range. Journal of bacteriology, 193(19), 5477–5486. doi:10.1128/JB.00439-11

Slade, K. M., Baker, R., Chua, M., Thompson, N. L., & Pielak, G. J. (2009). Effects of recombinant protein expression on green fluorescent protein diffusion in Escherichia coli. Biochemistry, 48(23), 5083–5089. doi:10.1021/bi9004107.

Zhang, L., Gray, L., Novick, R. P. and Ji, G. Transmembrane topology of AgrB, the protein involved in the post-translational modification of AgrD in Staphylococcus aureus . J Biol Chem. 2002 Sep 20;277(38):34736-42. Epub 2002 Jul 16.

"La ciencia es lo que entendemos lo suficientemente bien como para explicarle a una computadora. Arte es todo lo demás que hacemos".

— Donald Knuth.