Difference between revisions of "Team:Evry Paris-Saclay/Demonstrate"

 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 25: Line 25:
 
                     double bonds: </p>
 
                     double bonds: </p>
 
                     <ul>
 
                     <ul>
                         <li><p>punicic acid, C18:3 (9Z, 11E, 13Z) is synthesized by EC: 1.14.19.16 [1,2].</p></li>
+
                         <li><p>punicic acid, C18:3 (9Z, 11E, 13Z) is synthesized by EC: 1.14.19.16 [1, 2].</p></li>
                         <li><p>α-calendic acid, C18:3 (8E, 10E, 12Z), is synthesized by EC: 1.14.19.14 [3,4].</p></li>
+
                         <li><p>α-calendic acid, C18:3 (8E, 10E, 12Z), is synthesized by EC: 1.14.19.14 [3, 4].</p></li>
                         <li><p>α-oleosteaic acid, C18:3 (9Z, 11E, 13E) is synthesized by EC: 1.14.19.33 [5].</p></li>
+
                         <li><p>α-eleostearic acid, C18:3 (9Z, 11E, 13E) is synthesized by EC: 1.14.19.33 [5].</p></li>
 
                     </ul>
 
                     </ul>
 
                   <p>To achieve a sustainable bioproduction of such fatty acids in order to limit environmental and
 
                   <p>To achieve a sustainable bioproduction of such fatty acids in order to limit environmental and
Line 41: Line 41:
 
                 <h1 class="mt-5">Design</h1>
 
                 <h1 class="mt-5">Design</h1>
 
                 <p>
 
                 <p>
                     Linoleic acid, C18:2 (9Z,12Z), the substrate of FadX enzymes, is a natural metabolite for our
+
                     Linoleic acid, C18:2 (9Z, 12Z), the substrate of FadX enzymes, is a natural metabolite for our
 
                     chassis <i>Yarrowia lipolytica</i>. Thus, to convert it into punicic acid, only the presence of a EC:
 
                     chassis <i>Yarrowia lipolytica</i>. Thus, to convert it into punicic acid, only the presence of a EC:
 
                     1.14.19.16 enzyme is necessary (Figure 1).
 
                     1.14.19.16 enzyme is necessary (Figure 1).
 
                     Two EC: 1.14.19.16 enzymes were described in the literature: one from pomegranate / <i>Punica granatum</i>
 
                     Two EC: 1.14.19.16 enzymes were described in the literature: one from pomegranate / <i>Punica granatum</i>
                     (Pg-FadX, <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983061">BBa_K2983061</a>) and another one from
+
                     (Pg-FadX, <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983061" target="_blank">BBa_K2983061</a>) and another one from
 
                     the chinese cucumber / chinese snake gourd /
 
                     the chinese cucumber / chinese snake gourd /
 
                     <i>Trichosanthes kirilowii</i> (Tk-FadX, <a
 
                     <i>Trichosanthes kirilowii</i> (Tk-FadX, <a
                         href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983062">BBa_K2983062</a>).</p>
+
                         href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983062" target="_blank">BBa_K2983062</a>).</p>
  
  
Line 59: Line 59:
 
                     <p> To express these two enzymes (Pg-FadX and Tk-FadX) in our chassis, we codon optimized the sequences
 
                     <p> To express these two enzymes (Pg-FadX and Tk-FadX) in our chassis, we codon optimized the sequences
 
                     for <i>Y. lipolytica</i> and placed them under the control of the pTef1 promoter (<a
 
                     for <i>Y. lipolytica</i> and placed them under the control of the pTef1 promoter (<a
                         href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983052">BBa_K2983052</a>) and of the
+
                         href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983052" target="_blank">BBa_K2983052</a>) and of the
                     Lip2 terminator (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983055">BBa_K2983055</a>). The resulting
+
                     Lip2 terminator (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983055" target="_blank">BBa_K2983055</a>). The resulting
                     FadX transcriptional units (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983081">BBa_K2983081</a> and
+
                     FadX transcriptional units (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983081" target="_blank">BBa_K2983081</a> and
                     <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983082">BBa_K2983082</a>, respectively) were assembled
+
                     <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983082" target="_blank">BBa_K2983082</a>, respectively) were assembled
                     into our YL-pOdd1 plasmid (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983030">BBa_K2983030</a>) which
+
                     into our YL-pOdd1 plasmid (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983030" target="_blank">BBa_K2983030</a>) which
 
                     is part of
 
                     is part of
 
                     our Loop assembly system dedicated to our chassis, the oleaginous yeast <i>Y. lipolytica</i> (for further
 
                     our Loop assembly system dedicated to our chassis, the oleaginous yeast <i>Y. lipolytica</i> (for further
 
                     details on this system, visit the <a
 
                     details on this system, visit the <a
                         href="https://2019.igem.org/Team:Evry_Paris-Saclay/Design">dedicated page on this wiki</a>).
+
                         href="https://2019.igem.org/Team:Evry_Paris-Saclay/Design" target="_blank">dedicated page on this wiki</a>).
 
                     Thus, we
 
                     Thus, we
 
                     generated two FadX
 
                     generated two FadX
                     expression plasmids (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983181">BBa_K2983181</a> and <a
+
                     expression plasmids (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983181" target="_blank">BBa_K2983181</a> and <a
                         href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983182">BBa_K2983182</a>,
+
                         href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983182" target="_blank">BBa_K2983182</a>,
 
                     respectively) able to integrate upon
 
                     respectively) able to integrate upon
 
                     transformation, into a <i>Y. lipolytica</i> Po1d stain. All these parts are summarized in Table 1.<br>
 
                     transformation, into a <i>Y. lipolytica</i> Po1d stain. All these parts are summarized in Table 1.<br>
Line 86: Line 86:
 
                         </tr>
 
                         </tr>
 
                         <tr>
 
                         <tr>
                             <td>Punica granatum FadX (Pg-FadX)</td>
+
                             <td><i>Punica granatum</i> FadX (Pg-FadX)</td>
                             <td><a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983061">BBa_K2983061</a></td>
+
                             <td><a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983061" target="_blank">BBa_K2983061</a></td>
                             <td><a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983081">BBa_K2983081</a></td>
+
                             <td><a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983081" target="_blank">BBa_K2983081</a></td>
                             <td><a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983181">BBa_K2983181</a></td>
+
                             <td><a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983181" target="_blank">BBa_K2983181</a></td>
 
                         </tr>
 
                         </tr>
 
                         <tr>
 
                         <tr>
                             <td>Trichosanthes kirilowii FadX (Tk-FadX)</td>
+
                             <td><i>Trichosanthes kirilowii</i> FadX (Tk-FadX)</td>
                             <td><a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983062">BBa_K2983062</a></td>
+
                             <td><a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983062" target="_blank">BBa_K2983062</a></td>
                             <td><a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983082">BBa_K2983082</a></td>
+
                             <td><a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983082" target="_blank">BBa_K2983082</a></td>
                             <td><a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983182">BBa_K2983182</a></td>
+
                             <td><a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983182" target="_blank">BBa_K2983182</a></td>
 
                         </tr>
 
                         </tr>
 
                     </table><br>
 
                     </table><br>
Line 101: Line 101:
 
                      
 
                      
 
                   <p> <i>Yarrowia lipolytica: Yes, but which strain(s)?</i></p>
 
                   <p> <i>Yarrowia lipolytica: Yes, but which strain(s)?</i></p>
                     <p><i>Y. lipolytica</i> an ideal chassis for the bio-production of fatty acids in general and we have tried to
+
                     <p><i>Y. lipolytica</i> an ideal chassis for the bioproduction of fatty acids in general and we have tried to
 
                     put the odds on our side by choosing strains favoring even more the storage and production of these
 
                     put the odds on our side by choosing strains favoring even more the storage and production of these
 
                     fatty acids. It’s for this reason that, to produce punicic acid, we have opted for five strains
 
                     fatty acids. It’s for this reason that, to produce punicic acid, we have opted for five strains
Line 108: Line 108:
 
                     synthesis (<i>dga1</i>Δ <i>dga2</i>Δ <i>lro1</i>Δ <i>are1</i>Δ) is inactivated which favors fatty acids’ accumulation in a free form
 
                     synthesis (<i>dga1</i>Δ <i>dga2</i>Δ <i>lro1</i>Δ <i>are1</i>Δ) is inactivated which favors fatty acids’ accumulation in a free form
 
                     (R-COOH). Also, the oleic acid to linoleic acid conversion by Δ12 desaturation (<i>fad2</i>Δ) is disrupted,
 
                     (R-COOH). Also, the oleic acid to linoleic acid conversion by Δ12 desaturation (<i>fad2</i>Δ) is disrupted,
                     which was shown to favor punicic acid production in yeast <i>Schizosaccharomyces pombe</i> [10]. However, linoleic acid is the FadX substate and overexpressing Fad2 may lead to inscrease precursor concentration and thus bust punicic acid production  
+
                     which was shown to favor punicic acid production in yeast <i>Schizosaccharomyces pombe</i> [10]. However, linoleic acid is the FadX substate and overexpressing Fad2 may lead to inscrease precursor concentration and thus bust punicic acid production.
 
                     On the other hand, in strain JMY3820 fatty acids accumulation as triacylglycerols is promoted. In
 
                     On the other hand, in strain JMY3820 fatty acids accumulation as triacylglycerols is promoted. In
 
                     this strain the triacylglycerol mobilisation is inhibited by the disruption of the gene encoding the
 
                     this strain the triacylglycerol mobilisation is inhibited by the disruption of the gene encoding the
Line 118: Line 118:
  
 
                     <p>A computational analysis of these <i>Y. lipolytica</i> strains that assisted us in strain selection can be
 
                     <p>A computational analysis of these <i>Y. lipolytica</i> strains that assisted us in strain selection can be
                     found on the <a href="https://2019.igem.org/Team:Evry_Paris-Saclay/FBA">Dry Lab page of this
+
                     found on the <a href="https://2019.igem.org/Team:Evry_Paris-Saclay/FBA" target="_blank">Dry Lab page of this
 
                         wiki</a>. According to it, the best yield should be obtained using the JMY3820 strain.</p><br>
 
                         wiki</a>. According to it, the best yield should be obtained using the JMY3820 strain.</p><br>
  
Line 136: Line 136:
 
                         </tr>
 
                         </tr>
 
                         <tr>
 
                         <tr>
                             <td>JMY1233 (Po1d)</td>
+
                             <td>JMY1233</td>
 
                             <td>MATA <i>ura3-302 leu2-270 xpr2-322 pox1-6</i>Δ</td>
 
                             <td>MATA <i>ura3-302 leu2-270 xpr2-322 pox1-6</i>Δ</td>
 
                             <td>[12]</td>
 
                             <td>[12]</td>
 
                         </tr>
 
                         </tr>
 
                         <tr>
 
                         <tr>
                             <td>JMY1877 (Po1d)</td>
+
                             <td>JMY1877</td>
 
                             <td>MATA <i>ura3-302 leu2-270 xpr2-322</i> <i>dga1</i>Δ <i>dga2</i>Δ <i>lro1</i>Δ <i>are1</i>Δ</td>
 
                             <td>MATA <i>ura3-302 leu2-270 xpr2-322</i> <i>dga1</i>Δ <i>dga2</i>Δ <i>lro1</i>Δ <i>are1</i>Δ</td>
 
                             <td>[13]</td>
 
                             <td>[13]</td>
Line 157: Line 157:
 
                         <tr>
 
                         <tr>
 
                             <td>JMY3820</td>
 
                             <td>JMY3820</td>
                             <td>MATα <i>ura3-302 leu2-270 xpr2-322 pox1-6</i>Δ <i>tgl4</i> + pTEF-DGA2 + pTEF-GPD1</td>
+
                             <td>MATα <i>ura3-302 leu2-270 xpr2-322 pox1-6</i>Δ <i>tgl4</i>Δ + pTEF-DGA2 + pTEF-GPD1</td>
 
                             <td>[16]</td>
 
                             <td>[16]</td>
 
                         </tr>
 
                         </tr>
Line 163: Line 163:
 
                     <br>
 
                     <br>
 
                     <p> All these <i>Y. lipolytica</i> strains were transformed with the NotI digested Pg-FadX and Tk-FadX
 
                     <p> All these <i>Y. lipolytica</i> strains were transformed with the NotI digested Pg-FadX and Tk-FadX
                     expression plasmids (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983181">BBa_K2983181</a> and <a
+
                     expression plasmids (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983181" target="_blank">BBa_K2983181</a> and <a
                         href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983182">BBa_K2983182</a>) and the
+
                         href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983182" target="_blank">BBa_K2983182</a>) and the
 
                     genome integrations were confirmed by
 
                     genome integrations were confirmed by
 
                     PCR (using a pTef1 forward primer and a FadX specific reverse primer). As a negative control, we
 
                     PCR (using a pTef1 forward primer and a FadX specific reverse primer). As a negative control, we
 
                     also transformed them with the NotI digested empty YL-pOdd1 vector (<a
 
                     also transformed them with the NotI digested empty YL-pOdd1 vector (<a
                         href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983030">BBa_K2983030</a>). A second
+
                         href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983030" target="_blank">BBa_K2983030</a>). A second
 
                     transformation with a Leu2 plasmid (JMP62-LEU2ex-pTEF [17]) was performed to render the strains
 
                     transformation with a Leu2 plasmid (JMP62-LEU2ex-pTEF [17]) was performed to render the strains
 
                     prototroph for leucine too.
 
                     prototroph for leucine too.
Line 179: Line 179:
 
                     The <i>Y. lipolytica</i> strains expressing the Pg-FadX and Tk-FadX along with the negative control were
 
                     The <i>Y. lipolytica</i> strains expressing the Pg-FadX and Tk-FadX along with the negative control were
 
                     grown in either rich YPD medium or in minimal glucose medium YNB (containing 1.7 g/L yeast nitrogen
 
                     grown in either rich YPD medium or in minimal glucose medium YNB (containing 1.7 g/L yeast nitrogen
                     base without amino acids and ammonium sulfate, 1.5 g/L NH4Cl, 50 mM KH2PO4-Na2HPO4 buffer pH 6.8 and
+
                     base without amino acids and ammonium sulfate, 1.5 g/L NH<sub>4</sub>Cl, 50 mM KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>-Na<sub>2</sub>HPO<sub>4</sub> buffer pH 6.8 and
 
                     60 g/L glucose). The cultivation was performed at 28°C in 500-mL baffled flasks containing 100 mL of
 
                     60 g/L glucose). The cultivation was performed at 28°C in 500-mL baffled flasks containing 100 mL of
 
                     liquid media under agitation (180 rpm) as described by [15]. After 72h, cells were pelleted,
 
                     liquid media under agitation (180 rpm) as described by [15]. After 72h, cells were pelleted,
 
                     resuspended in water and frozen at -20°C before lyophilization. Fatty acids contained in about 50 mg
 
                     resuspended in water and frozen at -20°C before lyophilization. Fatty acids contained in about 50 mg
 
                     of dried yeast were converted to methyl esters (FAMEs) according to the protocol described by Browse
 
                     of dried yeast were converted to methyl esters (FAMEs) according to the protocol described by Browse
                     et al. [18] and were subsequently analysed by gas chromatography (GC), a technique in which the
+
                     <i>et al.</i> [18] and were subsequently analysed by gas chromatography (GC), a technique in which the
 
                     compounds in a sample are vaporized and migrated with a carrier gas on a stationary phase which is
 
                     compounds in a sample are vaporized and migrated with a carrier gas on a stationary phase which is
 
                     an inert solid support. With such technique it is possible to identify different fatty acids
 
                     an inert solid support. With such technique it is possible to identify different fatty acids
Line 195: Line 195:
 
                     <br>
 
                     <br>
 
                     The two standard chemicals, commercial punicic acid methyl ester (Matreya, LLC) and commercial
 
                     The two standard chemicals, commercial punicic acid methyl ester (Matreya, LLC) and commercial
                     pomegranate’s seeds essential oil (<a
+
                     pomegranate’s seeds essential oil (Huiles
                        href="https://www.huiles-et-sens.com/fr/352-huile-de-pepins-de-grenade-bio.html#/3-conditionnement-30_ml">Huiles
+
                         et Sens, Centiflor Laboratory), were analyzed by GC. </p>
                         et Sens, Centiflor Laboratory</a>), were analyzed by GC. </p>
+
 
<p>From
 
<p>From
 
                     the pure commercial punicic acid methyl ester (Matreya, LLC), a main peak having a retention time of
 
                     the pure commercial punicic acid methyl ester (Matreya, LLC), a main peak having a retention time of
Line 238: Line 237:
 
                     a FadX expression cassette was performed.
 
                     a FadX expression cassette was performed.
 
                     As shown in Figure 4, the expression cassettes of both Pg-FadX (<a
 
                     As shown in Figure 4, the expression cassettes of both Pg-FadX (<a
                         href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983181">BBa_K2983181</a>) and Tk-FadX
+
                         href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983181" target="_blank">BBa_K2983181</a>) and Tk-FadX
                     (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983182">BBa_K2983182</a>) inserted in the genome of <i>Y. lipolytica</i> JMY3820 strain are able to
+
                     (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983182" target="_blank">BBa_K2983182</a>) inserted in the genome of <i>Y. lipolytica</i> JMY3820 strain are able to
 
                     produce a compound
 
                     produce a compound
 
                     with a retention time of 6.1 minutes. This compound is most likely punicic acid, since its retention
 
                     with a retention time of 6.1 minutes. This compound is most likely punicic acid, since its retention
 
                     time is the same as that of punicic acid from pomegranate seed oil. Also, this peak is absent in the
 
                     time is the same as that of punicic acid from pomegranate seed oil. Also, this peak is absent in the
 
                     negative control samples which was prepared using an empty YL-pOdd1 (<a
 
                     negative control samples which was prepared using an empty YL-pOdd1 (<a
                         href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983030">BBa_K2983030</a>). This suggests
+
                         href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983030" target="_blank">BBa_K2983030</a>). This suggests
 
                     that our modified yeast are capable of producing punicic acid when expressing either Pg-FadX
 
                     that our modified yeast are capable of producing punicic acid when expressing either Pg-FadX
                     (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983181">BBa_K2983181</a>) or Tk-FadX (<a
+
                     (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983181" target="_blank">BBa_K2983181</a>) or Tk-FadX (<a
                         href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983182">BBa_K2983182</a>).</p>   
+
                         href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983182" target="_blank">BBa_K2983182</a>).</p>   
 
                 </div>         
 
                 </div>         
  
Line 255: Line 254:
  
  
                     <div class="font-weight-light"><center>Figure 4. GC chromatograms of pomegranate seed oil and of culturing media taken after 72 hours of incubation of <i>Y. lipolytica</i> JMY3820 strains harboring the negative control (an empty YL-pOdd1 (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983030">BBa_K2983030</a>)), the Pg-FadX
+
                     <div class="font-weight-light"><center>Figure 4. GC chromatograms of pomegranate seed oil and of culturing media taken after 72 hours of incubation of <i>Y. lipolytica</i> JMY3820 strains harboring the negative control (an empty YL-pOdd1 (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983030" target="_blank">BBa_K2983030</a>)), the Pg-FadX
                     (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983181">BBa_K2983181</a>) or  
+
                     (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983181" target="_blank">BBa_K2983181</a>) or  
                     the Tk-FadX (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983182">BBa_K2983182</a>). <br><br></center></div><br>
+
                     the Tk-FadX (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983182" target="_blank">BBa_K2983182</a>). <br><br></center></div><br>
 
            
 
            
 
                     <br>
 
                     <br>
 
                     <p> However, the amount of punicic acid produced is low and we were only able to detect it when Pg-FadX
 
                     <p> However, the amount of punicic acid produced is low and we were only able to detect it when Pg-FadX
                     (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983181">BBa_K2983181</a>) and Tk-FadX (<a
+
                     (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983181" target="_blank">BBa_K2983181</a>) and Tk-FadX (<a
                         href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983182">BBa_K2983182</a>) were inserted in the genome of
+
                         href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983182" target="_blank">BBa_K2983182</a>) were inserted in the genome of
 
                     <i>Y. lipolytica</i> JMY3820
 
                     <i>Y. lipolytica</i> JMY3820
                     strain, but not when using as a chassis the wild-type JMY195 or the JMY2159 strains. This result is in agreement with <a href="https://2019.igem.org/Team:Evry_Paris-Saclay/FBA">our computational analysis</a>.
+
                     strain, but not when using as a chassis the wild-type JMY195 or the JMY2159 strains. This result is in agreement with <a href="https://2019.igem.org/Team:Evry_Paris-Saclay/FBA" target="_blank">our computational analysis</a>.
  
 
Also, this
 
Also, this
Line 283: Line 282:
 
                    
 
                    
 
                     On the other hand, both Pg-FadX and Tk-FadX are expressed under the control of pTef1 promoter
 
                     On the other hand, both Pg-FadX and Tk-FadX are expressed under the control of pTef1 promoter
                     (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983052">BBa_K2983052</a>), a medium strength constitutive
+
                     (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983052" target="_blank">BBa_K2983052</a>), a medium strength constitutive
 
                     promoter. Increasing the promoter strength is a
 
                     promoter. Increasing the promoter strength is a
 
                     conceivable alternative for increasing enzyme expression and thus the punicic acid production.
 
                     conceivable alternative for increasing enzyme expression and thus the punicic acid production.
Line 306: Line 305:
 
                     in UV (like punicic acid does) is also visible and it may be the punicoyl-CoA. Using TLC, no
 
                     in UV (like punicic acid does) is also visible and it may be the punicoyl-CoA. Using TLC, no
 
                     detectable punicic acid production by the <i>Y. lipolytica</i> JMY3820 strain harboring the Pg-FadX
 
                     detectable punicic acid production by the <i>Y. lipolytica</i> JMY3820 strain harboring the Pg-FadX
                     (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983181">BBa_K2983181</a>) could be detected, contrary to
+
                     (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983181" target="_blank">BBa_K2983181</a>) could be detected, contrary to
 
                     the <i>S. pombe</i> strain expressing Pg-FadX [10].<br> </p>
 
                     the <i>S. pombe</i> strain expressing Pg-FadX [10].<br> </p>
 
                     <br>
 
                     <br>
Line 313: Line 312:
 
                    
 
                    
 
                     <div class="font-weight-light"><center>Figure 5. Microscopic imaging of <i>Y. lipolytica</i> JMY3820 strain harboring the Pg-FadX (<a
 
                     <div class="font-weight-light"><center>Figure 5. Microscopic imaging of <i>Y. lipolytica</i> JMY3820 strain harboring the Pg-FadX (<a
                         href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983181">BBa_K2983181</a>)
+
                         href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983181" target="_blank">BBa_K2983181</a>)
 
                     grown for 72 hours in rich YPD supplemented with increasing amounts of pomegranate oil.<br></center></div><br>
 
                     grown for 72 hours in rich YPD supplemented with increasing amounts of pomegranate oil.<br></center></div><br>
  
Line 319: Line 318:
 
                     <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2019/7/72/T--Evry_Paris-Saclay--TLC_.png" width="700" height="437" class="img-fluid"></center>
 
                     <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2019/7/72/T--Evry_Paris-Saclay--TLC_.png" width="700" height="437" class="img-fluid"></center>
 
                     <div class="font-weight-light"><center>Figure 6. Thin-layer chromatogram (TLC) of <i>Y. lipolytica</i> JMY3820 strain harboring the Pg-FadX
 
                     <div class="font-weight-light"><center>Figure 6. Thin-layer chromatogram (TLC) of <i>Y. lipolytica</i> JMY3820 strain harboring the Pg-FadX
                     (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983181">BBa_K2983181</a>), <i>S. pombe</i> strain harboring the
+
                     (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983181" target="_blank">BBa_K2983181</a>), <i>S. pombe</i> strain harboring the
 
                     Pg-FadX [10], wild-type <i>S. pombe</i>, and pomegranate seed oil.<br></center></div><br>
 
                     Pg-FadX [10], wild-type <i>S. pombe</i>, and pomegranate seed oil.<br></center></div><br>
  
Line 325: Line 324:
 
                     <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2019/0/06/T--Evry_Paris-Saclay--TLC_UV.png" width="385" height="424"; class="img-fluid"></center>
 
                     <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2019/0/06/T--Evry_Paris-Saclay--TLC_UV.png" width="385" height="424"; class="img-fluid"></center>
 
                    
 
                    
                   <div class="font-weight-light"><center>Figure 7. UV scan of the thin-layer chromatogram (TLC) of <i>Y. lipolytica</i> JMY3820 strain harboring the Pg-FadX (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983181">BBa_K2983181</a>) grown in the absence or
+
                   <div class="font-weight-light"><center>Figure 7. UV scan of the thin-layer chromatogram (TLC) of <i>Y. lipolytica</i> JMY3820 strain harboring the Pg-FadX (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983181" target="_blank">BBa_K2983181</a>) grown in the absence or
 
                     in the presence of 0.5% pomegranate seed oil.<br></center></div><br>
 
                     in the presence of 0.5% pomegranate seed oil.<br></center></div><br>
 
                      
 
                      
Line 342: Line 341:
 
                     amounts of punicic acid, a CLnA with interesting properties. This production is dependent on the
 
                     amounts of punicic acid, a CLnA with interesting properties. This production is dependent on the
 
                     expression of a FadX enzyme, either Pg-FadX (<a
 
                     expression of a FadX enzyme, either Pg-FadX (<a
                         href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983061">BBa_K2983061</a>) or Tk-FadX (<a
+
                         href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983061" target="_blank">BBa_K2983061</a>) or Tk-FadX (<a
                         href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983062">BBa_K2983062</a>). Optimizing the
+
                         href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2983062" target="_blank">BBa_K2983062</a>). Optimizing the
 
                     culturing conditions and fatty acids preservation, but also performing other strain engineering
 
                     culturing conditions and fatty acids preservation, but also performing other strain engineering
 
                     manipulations may lead to making <i>Yarrowia lipolytica</i> the CLnA production factory we had aimed for.
 
                     manipulations may lead to making <i>Yarrowia lipolytica</i> the CLnA production factory we had aimed for.
Line 361: Line 360:
 
                 <br><small class="mr-2">[4]</small>Cahoon EB, Ripp KG, Hall SE, Kinney AJ. Formation of conjugated delta8,delta10-double bonds by delta12-oleic-acid desaturase-related enzymes: biosynthetic origin of calendic acid. J Biol Chem (2001) 276, 2637-2643.
 
                 <br><small class="mr-2">[4]</small>Cahoon EB, Ripp KG, Hall SE, Kinney AJ. Formation of conjugated delta8,delta10-double bonds by delta12-oleic-acid desaturase-related enzymes: biosynthetic origin of calendic acid. J Biol Chem (2001) 276, 2637-2643.
  
                 <br><small class="mr-2">[5]</small>Cahoon EB, Carlson TJ, Ripp KG, Schweiger BJ, Cook GA, Hall SE, Kinney AJ. Biosynthetic origin of conjugated double bonds: production of fatty acid components of high-value drying oils in transgenic soybean embryos. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (1999) 96, 12935-12940.
+
                 <br><small class="mr-2">[5]</small>Cahoon EB, Carlson TJ, Ripp KG, Schweiger BJ, Cook GA, Hall SE, Kinney AJ. Biosynthetic origin of conjugated double bonds: production of fatty acid components of high-value drying oils in transgenic soybean embryos. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (1999) 96, 12935-12940.
  
 
                 <br><small class="mr-2">[6]</small>Beopoulos A, Cescut J, Haddouche R, Uribelarrea JL, Molina-Jouve C, Nicaud JM. <i>Yarrowia lipolytica</i> as a model for bio-oil production. Prog Lipid Res (2009) 48, 375-387.  
 
                 <br><small class="mr-2">[6]</small>Beopoulos A, Cescut J, Haddouche R, Uribelarrea JL, Molina-Jouve C, Nicaud JM. <i>Yarrowia lipolytica</i> as a model for bio-oil production. Prog Lipid Res (2009) 48, 375-387.  

Latest revision as of 21:36, 14 December 2019

Title

Bioproduction

Conjugated linolenic acids (CLnAs) are synthetized by bifunctional fatty acid conjugase / desaturase (FadX) enzymes from linoleic acid (incorporated into phosphatidylcholine). The sequences of the enzymes catalyzing the synthesis of 3 of the 7 known CLnAs have been described in the literature and their activities are specific to the position and the stereochemistry of the double bonds:

  • punicic acid, C18:3 (9Z, 11E, 13Z) is synthesized by EC: 1.14.19.16 [1, 2].

  • α-calendic acid, C18:3 (8E, 10E, 12Z), is synthesized by EC: 1.14.19.14 [3, 4].

  • α-eleostearic acid, C18:3 (9Z, 11E, 13E) is synthesized by EC: 1.14.19.33 [5].

To achieve a sustainable bioproduction of such fatty acids in order to limit environmental and economical problems, we decided to use as a biological chassis the oleaginous yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. This species has already proven its effectiveness for the production of fatty acids, thanks to its highly developed lipid metabolism [6-8]. As a proof of concept of our project, we decided to focus on one of those CLnAs, the punicic acid, that has interesting properties such as anti-obesity, anti-inflammatory, anti-cancer, anti-diabetes activities [9].

Design

Linoleic acid, C18:2 (9Z, 12Z), the substrate of FadX enzymes, is a natural metabolite for our chassis Yarrowia lipolytica. Thus, to convert it into punicic acid, only the presence of a EC: 1.14.19.16 enzyme is necessary (Figure 1). Two EC: 1.14.19.16 enzymes were described in the literature: one from pomegranate / Punica granatum (Pg-FadX, BBa_K2983061) and another one from the chinese cucumber / chinese snake gourd / Trichosanthes kirilowii (Tk-FadX, BBa_K2983062).

Figure 1. Conversion of linoleic acid to punicic acid (both incorporated into phosphatidylcholine).

To express these two enzymes (Pg-FadX and Tk-FadX) in our chassis, we codon optimized the sequences for Y. lipolytica and placed them under the control of the pTef1 promoter (BBa_K2983052) and of the Lip2 terminator (BBa_K2983055). The resulting FadX transcriptional units (BBa_K2983081 and BBa_K2983082, respectively) were assembled into our YL-pOdd1 plasmid (BBa_K2983030) which is part of our Loop assembly system dedicated to our chassis, the oleaginous yeast Y. lipolytica (for further details on this system, visit the dedicated page on this wiki). Thus, we generated two FadX expression plasmids (BBa_K2983181 and BBa_K2983182, respectively) able to integrate upon transformation, into a Y. lipolytica Po1d stain. All these parts are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1. Punicic acid production devices.
Gene name FadX genes’ part numbers FadX transcriptional units’ part numbers Y. lipolytica genome integration cassettes' part numbers
Punica granatum FadX (Pg-FadX) BBa_K2983061 BBa_K2983081 BBa_K2983181
Trichosanthes kirilowii FadX (Tk-FadX) BBa_K2983062 BBa_K2983082 BBa_K2983182


Yarrowia lipolytica: Yes, but which strain(s)?

Y. lipolytica an ideal chassis for the bioproduction of fatty acids in general and we have tried to put the odds on our side by choosing strains favoring even more the storage and production of these fatty acids. It’s for this reason that, to produce punicic acid, we have opted for five strains JMY1233, JMY1877, JMY2159, JMY3325 and JMY3820 (Table 2). In 4 of these strains the mechanisms of fatty acids’ degradation through the β-oxidation pathway are disrupted (pox1-6Δ). In others, the triacylglycerol synthesis (dga1Δ dga2Δ lro1Δ are1Δ) is inactivated which favors fatty acids’ accumulation in a free form (R-COOH). Also, the oleic acid to linoleic acid conversion by Δ12 desaturation (fad2Δ) is disrupted, which was shown to favor punicic acid production in yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe [10]. However, linoleic acid is the FadX substate and overexpressing Fad2 may lead to inscrease precursor concentration and thus bust punicic acid production. On the other hand, in strain JMY3820 fatty acids accumulation as triacylglycerols is promoted. In this strain the triacylglycerol mobilisation is inhibited by the disruption of the gene encoding the triglyceride lipase (tgl4Δ), the triacylglycerol degradation is inhibited by deleting POX (POX1-6) genes. And two enzymes of the triacylglycerol biosynthetic pathway, the acyl-CoA:diacylglycerolacyltransferase (DGA2) and glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GPD1) are overexpressed to push and pull triacylglycerol biosynthesis. As a control, we also use the auxotrophic wild-type strain JMY195.

A computational analysis of these Y. lipolytica strains that assisted us in strain selection can be found on the Dry Lab page of this wiki. According to it, the best yield should be obtained using the JMY3820 strain.


Table 2. Yarrowia lipolytica strains used as chassis for fatty acids’ production.
Strain name Genotype Reference
JMY195 (Po1d) MATA ura3-302 leu2-270 xpr2-322 [11]
JMY1233 MATA ura3-302 leu2-270 xpr2-322 pox1-6Δ [12]
JMY1877 MATA ura3-302 leu2-270 xpr2-322 dga1Δ dga2Δ lro1Δ are1Δ [13]
JMY2159 MATA ura3-302 leu2-270 xpr2-322 pox1-6Δ dga1Δ dga2Δ lro1Δ fad2Δ [14]
JMY3325 MATA ura3-302 leu2-270 xpr2-322 pox1-6Δ dga1Δ dga2Δ lro1Δ fad2Δ pTEF-FAD2-LEU2 [15]
JMY3820 MATα ura3-302 leu2-270 xpr2-322 pox1-6Δ tgl4Δ + pTEF-DGA2 + pTEF-GPD1 [16]


All these Y. lipolytica strains were transformed with the NotI digested Pg-FadX and Tk-FadX expression plasmids (BBa_K2983181 and BBa_K2983182) and the genome integrations were confirmed by PCR (using a pTef1 forward primer and a FadX specific reverse primer). As a negative control, we also transformed them with the NotI digested empty YL-pOdd1 vector (BBa_K2983030). A second transformation with a Leu2 plasmid (JMP62-LEU2ex-pTEF [17]) was performed to render the strains prototroph for leucine too.

Experimental Setup

The Y. lipolytica strains expressing the Pg-FadX and Tk-FadX along with the negative control were grown in either rich YPD medium or in minimal glucose medium YNB (containing 1.7 g/L yeast nitrogen base without amino acids and ammonium sulfate, 1.5 g/L NH4Cl, 50 mM KH2PO4-Na2HPO4 buffer pH 6.8 and 60 g/L glucose). The cultivation was performed at 28°C in 500-mL baffled flasks containing 100 mL of liquid media under agitation (180 rpm) as described by [15]. After 72h, cells were pelleted, resuspended in water and frozen at -20°C before lyophilization. Fatty acids contained in about 50 mg of dried yeast were converted to methyl esters (FAMEs) according to the protocol described by Browse et al. [18] and were subsequently analysed by gas chromatography (GC), a technique in which the compounds in a sample are vaporized and migrated with a carrier gas on a stationary phase which is an inert solid support. With such technique it is possible to identify different fatty acids following the length of their carbon chain and the number of unsaturation on those chain, two properties which modify the capacity of fatty acid to migrate with the carrier gas on the column. The GC analysis was carried out with a Varian 3900 instrument equipped with a flame ionization detector and a Varian FactorFour vf-23ms column, where the bleed specification at 260°C is 3 pA (30 m, 0.25 mm, 0.25 μm). All manipulations were performed taking care of protecting samples from light to avoid UV driven oxidation of punicic acid.

The two standard chemicals, commercial punicic acid methyl ester (Matreya, LLC) and commercial pomegranate’s seeds essential oil (Huiles et Sens, Centiflor Laboratory), were analyzed by GC.

From the pure commercial punicic acid methyl ester (Matreya, LLC), a main peak having a retention time of 6.19 minutes was observed as shown in Figure 2. Two additional peaks with retention times of 6.30 minutes and 6.39 minutes were also visible, indicating the instability of the punicic acid methyl ester.

The presence of punicic acid was also revealed in a commercial pomegranate’s seeds essential oil containing 60% of punicic acid according to the provider’s specifications. As shown in Figure 3, a main peak having a retention time of 6.19 minutes was observed. Several other peaks corresponding to the other fatty acids present in the seed preparation are also visible on the GC chromatogram. It is worth highlighting that, compared to commercial punicic acid methyl ester, the main peak has a much higher intensity which helps distinguish it from other minor peaks. This is most probably due to the protective, antioxidant action of the other components of this commercial pomegranate’s seeds essential oil, especially vitamin E.

Figure 2: Gas chromatography analysis of commercial punicic acid methyl ester (5%).


Figure 3: Gas chromatography analysis of commercial pomegranate’s seeds essential oil containing 60% of punicic acid according to provider specifications.




Result

GC analysis of samples isolated from the fermentation broth of the Y. lipolytica strains harbouring a FadX expression cassette was performed. As shown in Figure 4, the expression cassettes of both Pg-FadX (BBa_K2983181) and Tk-FadX (BBa_K2983182) inserted in the genome of Y. lipolytica JMY3820 strain are able to produce a compound with a retention time of 6.1 minutes. This compound is most likely punicic acid, since its retention time is the same as that of punicic acid from pomegranate seed oil. Also, this peak is absent in the negative control samples which was prepared using an empty YL-pOdd1 (BBa_K2983030). This suggests that our modified yeast are capable of producing punicic acid when expressing either Pg-FadX (BBa_K2983181) or Tk-FadX (BBa_K2983182).

Figure 4. GC chromatograms of pomegranate seed oil and of culturing media taken after 72 hours of incubation of Y. lipolytica JMY3820 strains harboring the negative control (an empty YL-pOdd1 (BBa_K2983030)), the Pg-FadX (BBa_K2983181) or the Tk-FadX (BBa_K2983182).



However, the amount of punicic acid produced is low and we were only able to detect it when Pg-FadX (BBa_K2983181) and Tk-FadX (BBa_K2983182) were inserted in the genome of Y. lipolytica JMY3820 strain, but not when using as a chassis the wild-type JMY195 or the JMY2159 strains. This result is in agreement with our computational analysis. Also, this production was only detected when cells were grown in minimal glucose medium YNB.

The production of punicic acid in Y. lipolytica is certainly possible but limited by various factors. It’s rapid degradation, either through the cellular metabolism or by a light induced oxidation may account for the low observed yield. Indeed punicic acid is a very effective anti-oxidant and therefore it is sensitive to oxidation. This oxidation may be responsible for the 3 peaks present in the commercial punicic acid methyl ester (Figure 2) and the protective effect of vitamin E present in the pomegranate oil may account for the stability of punicic acid in this preparation (Figure 3). Also, the production of punicic acid was assessed after 72h of Y. lipolytica culturing, a time inspired by the dynamics of CLA (conjugated linoleic acids) production in similar conditions [15]. This culturing time is in agreement with the observations made when producing punicic acid in other yeast species, Saccharomyces cerevisiae [1,2] or Schizosaccharomyces pombe [10]. A refinement of the culturing conditions thus appears necessary to increase the punicic acid production.
On the other hand, both Pg-FadX and Tk-FadX are expressed under the control of pTef1 promoter (BBa_K2983052), a medium strength constitutive promoter. Increasing the promoter strength is a conceivable alternative for increasing enzyme expression and thus the punicic acid production. Moreover, the use of inducible promoters may allow separating the biomass production from the punicic acid production. This is particularly important when the compound to be produced is toxic.

To rule out the possible toxicity of punicic acid and to evaluate the capacity of Y. lipolytica to store it, and not reduce it (to linoleic or even to oleic acid), we performed a feeding experiment in which cells were grown in the presence of increasing concentrations of pomegranate oil containing 60% punicic acid. The microscopic images presented in Figure 5 show an increase of lipid bodies size when the concentration of punicic acid increases. Extracellular lipids are accumulating inside yeast, albeit at higher pomegranate oil concentration they are also visible in the media.

A GC analysis confirmed the presence of punicic acid inside Y. lipolytica (the amount increased at higher pomegranate oil added in the culturing media).

To investigate further Y. lipolytica’s ability to store punicic acid, we contacted Dr. Romain Holic, a specialist of punicic acid production in yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe [10], who kindly analysed our yeast strain by thin-layer chromatography (TLC).

The results presented in Figures 6 and 7 show that Y. lipolytica is able to intake punicic acid (contrary to S. pombe). Inside cells, punicic acid is present in its free form, but also accumulates as triacylglycerols with 1, 2 or 3 punicic acid chains per molecule. An unknown compound absorbing in UV (like punicic acid does) is also visible and it may be the punicoyl-CoA. Using TLC, no detectable punicic acid production by the Y. lipolytica JMY3820 strain harboring the Pg-FadX (BBa_K2983181) could be detected, contrary to the S. pombe strain expressing Pg-FadX [10].


Figure 5. Microscopic imaging of Y. lipolytica JMY3820 strain harboring the Pg-FadX (BBa_K2983181) grown for 72 hours in rich YPD supplemented with increasing amounts of pomegranate oil.

Figure 6. Thin-layer chromatogram (TLC) of Y. lipolytica JMY3820 strain harboring the Pg-FadX (BBa_K2983181), S. pombe strain harboring the Pg-FadX [10], wild-type S. pombe, and pomegranate seed oil.

Figure 7. UV scan of the thin-layer chromatogram (TLC) of Y. lipolytica JMY3820 strain harboring the Pg-FadX (BBa_K2983181) grown in the absence or in the presence of 0.5% pomegranate seed oil.


Other strain engineering may be envisioned in order to increase punicic acid production, the most obvious being the overexpression, along with the FadX enzymes, of proteins like Ole1 (that converts stearyl-CoA to oleoyl-CoA) in order to boost CLnA precursors and Ldp1 (lipid droplet protein) and Lro1 (phospholipid:diacylglycerol acyltransferase) in order to increase the storage of CLnA in lipid droplets as triacylglycerols.

Conclusions

We have successfully built two Yarrowia lipolytica strains able to produce limited but detectable amounts of punicic acid, a CLnA with interesting properties. This production is dependent on the expression of a FadX enzyme, either Pg-FadX (BBa_K2983061) or Tk-FadX (BBa_K2983062). Optimizing the culturing conditions and fatty acids preservation, but also performing other strain engineering manipulations may lead to making Yarrowia lipolytica the CLnA production factory we had aimed for.

References

[1]Hornung E, Pernstich C, Feussner I. Formation of conjugated Delta11Delta13-double bonds by Delta12-linoleic acid (1,4)-acyl-lipid-desaturase in pomegranate seeds. Eur J Biochem (2002) 269, 4852-4859.
[2]Iwabuchi M, Kohno-Murase J, Imamura J. Delta 12-oleate desaturase-related enzymes associated with formation of conjugated trans-delta 11, cis-delta 13 double bonds. J Biol Chem (2003) 278, 4603-4610.
[3]Qiu X, Reed DW, Hong H, MacKenzie SL, Covello PS. Identification and analysis of a gene from Calendula officinalis encoding a fatty acid conjugase. Plant Physiol (2001) 125, 847-855.
[4]Cahoon EB, Ripp KG, Hall SE, Kinney AJ. Formation of conjugated delta8,delta10-double bonds by delta12-oleic-acid desaturase-related enzymes: biosynthetic origin of calendic acid. J Biol Chem (2001) 276, 2637-2643.
[5]Cahoon EB, Carlson TJ, Ripp KG, Schweiger BJ, Cook GA, Hall SE, Kinney AJ. Biosynthetic origin of conjugated double bonds: production of fatty acid components of high-value drying oils in transgenic soybean embryos. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (1999) 96, 12935-12940.
[6]Beopoulos A, Cescut J, Haddouche R, Uribelarrea JL, Molina-Jouve C, Nicaud JM. Yarrowia lipolytica as a model for bio-oil production. Prog Lipid Res (2009) 48, 375-387.
[7]Zhang B, Chen H, Li M, Gu Z, Song Y, Ratledge C, Chen YQ, Zhang H, Chen W. Genetic engineering of Yarrowia lipolytica for enhanced production of trans-10, cis-12 conjugated linoleic acid. Microb Cell Fact (2013) 12, 70.
[8]Ledesma-Amaro R, Nicaud JM. Yarrowia lipolytica as a biotechnological chassis to produce usual and unusual fatty acids. Pasrog Lipid Res (2016) 61, 40-50.
[9]Holic R, Xu Y, Caldo KMP, Singer SD, Field CJ, Weselake RJ, Chen G. Bioactivity and biotechnological production of punicic acid. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol (2018) 102, 3537-3549.
[10]Garaiova M, Mietkiewska E, Weselake RJ, Holic R. Metabolic engineering of Schizosaccharomyces pombe to produce punicic acid, a conjugated fatty acid with nutraceutic properties. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol (2017) 101, 7913-7922.
[11]Barth G, Gaillardin C. Yarrowia lipolytica. In: Wolf K (ed) Non conventional yeasts in biotechnology. Springer, Berlin (1996) 1, 314-388.
[12]Beopoulos A, Mrozova Z, Thevenieau F, Le Dall MT, Hapala I, Papanikolaou S, Chardot T, Nicaud JM. Control of lipid accumulation in the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. Appl Environ Microbiol (2008)74, 7779-7789.
[13]Beopoulos A, Haddouche R, Kabran P, Dulermo T, Chardot T, Nicaud JM. Identification and characterization of DGA2, an acyltransferase of the DGAT1 acyl-CoA:diacylglycerol acyltransferase family in the oleaginous yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. New insights into the storage lipid metabolism of oleaginous yeasts. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol (2012) 93, 1523-1537.
[14]Beopoulos A, Verbeke J, Bordes F, Guicherd M, Bressy M, Marty A, Nicaud JM. Metabolic engineering for ricinoleic acid production in the oleaginous yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol (2014) 98, 251-262.
[15]Imatoukene N, Verbeke J, Beopoulos A, Idrissi Taghki A, Thomasset B, Sarde CO, Nonus M, Nicaud JM. A metabolic engineering strategy for producing conjugated linoleic acids using the oleaginous yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol (2017) 101, 4605-4616.
[16]Lazar Z, Dulermo T, Neuvéglise C, Crutz-Le Coq AM, Nicaud JM. Hexokinase - A limiting factor in lipid production from fructose in Yarrowia lipolytica. Metab Eng (2014) 26, 89-99.
[17]Dulermo R, Brunel F, Dulermo T, Ledesma-Amaro R, Vion J, Trassaert M, Thomas S, Nicaud JM, Leplat C. Using a vector pool containing variable-strength promoters to optimize protein production in Yarrowia lipolytica. Microb Cell Fact (2017) 16, 31.
[18]Browse J, McCourt PJ, Somerville CR. Fatty acid composition of leaf lipids determined after combined digestion and fatty acid methyl ester formation from fresh tissue. Anal Biochem (1986) 152, 141-145.