Difference between revisions of "Team:DTU-Denmark/Design Plasmid"

Line 69: Line 69:
 
<div class="row flex-center sm-no-flex interlabspace">
 
<div class="row flex-center sm-no-flex interlabspace">
  
<div class=" sm-no-float col-md-4 bbmobile col-sm-12">
+
<div class=" sm-no-float col-md-5 bbmobile col-sm-12">
  
 
<figure>
 
<figure>
Line 79: Line 79:
  
  
<div class="sm-no-float col-md-8">
+
<div class="sm-no-float col-md-7">
  
 
<h2>Creating a promoter test platform for <i>A. niger</i> </h2>
 
<h2>Creating a promoter test platform for <i>A. niger</i> </h2>
Line 92: Line 92:
 
   </div>
 
   </div>
  
<div class=" sm-no-float col-md-4 bbmobileshow col-sm-12 ">
+
<div class=" sm-no-float col-md-5 bbmobileshow col-sm-12 ">
  
 
<img  src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2019/d/d8/T--DTU-Denmark--commingsoon.png" class="safetyfirstimg"/>
 
<img  src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2019/d/d8/T--DTU-Denmark--commingsoon.png" class="safetyfirstimg"/>

Revision as of 15:42, 21 October 2019

Vector Design

As there were no suitable devices in the iGEM registry for testing promoters in filamentous fungi, our team had to develop our own test platform for easy cloning and characterisation of promoters.

This figure shows a bacterial promoter in front of the fluorescent protein mCherry being replaced by a synthetic promoter when cut with BsaI, thus allowing for expression in our organism.
The figure shows the general strategy for replacing the prokaryotic promoter upstream of mCherry with a synthetic promoter using Golden Gate assembly.

Creating a promoter test platform for A. niger 

As there were no suitable devices in the iGEM registry for testing promoters in filamentous fungi, our team had to develop our own test platform for easy cloning and characterization of promoters. Our solution was simple: We built a new reporter device by placing an exchangeable placeholder promoter upstream of an ORF expressing a fluorescent protein. We elected to use mCherry as our reporter protein because it is visible to the naked eye in E. coli and chemical standards exist, which will ease comparisons between plate readers and labs. Our choice of mCherry is described in greater detail on the Measurement design page.

Using the new iGEM Type IIs RFC[1000] standard, we ensured that a placeholder promoter would be able to be cut out from the test device using BsaI, which would leave fusion sequences on the test device strands that would be compatible with level 0 MoClo promoter+5’UTR parts. The whole test device is flanked by two of the Unique Nucleotide Sequences (UNSs), originally identified by Torella et. al. 2014 [2]. As the name suggests, these nucleotide sequences have been selected on the basis of being unique, i.e. these sequences do not have a direct match anywhere in the E.coli genome. When using E.coli as a host organism for constructing synthetic circuits, these UNSs can therefore be used for Gibson cloning or other kinds of homology-based cloning methods. Alternatively, the test device can be flanked by SapI sites, making the whole transcriptional unit of the test device be able to be integrated into any even plasmid when using the loop system. [1]     

More text soon

Soon.



Sources here will also come soon

The logos of our three biggest supporters, DTU Blue Dot, Novo Nordisk fonden and Otto Mønsted fonden The logos of all of our sponsors, DTU, BioNordica, Eurofins Genomics, Qiagen, NEB New England biolabs, IDT Integrated DNA technologies and Twist bioscience