Team:BHSF ND/Project/Recombinase
2019 IGEM BHSF_NDIndex
1. Background
2. Design
4. Improvement
5. Discussion
See More About
Wetlab
Leakage
Bistable System
Toxin
Recombinase
Background
We sought for a structure which could implement permanent memory on changes in our circuit while effectively connects our double bistable system and were inspired by the design of recombinase in Peking 2017. We tested three types of recombinase, Bxb1, TP901, PhiC31 they had in their project in our experiment.
Scientists discovered that phages phiC31 integrase make use of LSTP integrases in mediating phage integration and excision into the bacterial genome between their cognate recognition sites, attB (bacterium) and attP (phage). By placing these sites in the opposite orientation, LSTP integrases cleave, rotate and rejoin the DNA to invert the region between sites. As shown in figure 1, LSTP integrases catalyze insertion of phage genome (yellow) into the bacterial genome (blue) between attB and attP sites, which form hybrid attL and attR sites. Multicolored arrowheads illustrate the sequence changes that occur during strand exchange, with the core sequence shown in green.
We make use of the property of irreversible recombinase which can implement permanent memory so that before reverting the recombinase the second layer, the DNase, is inhibited in working condition, and after reverting the second layer can be eternally expressed, preventing the bacterium from reviving through other techniques.
Design
In our team, we include the recombinase in order to implement the permanent memory of the circuit by irreversibly inverting the orientation of the intervening PR1 according to article Permanent genetic memory with >1-byte capacity. The recombinase is able to flip the DNA in only one direction and thus implement permanent memory.
When it is applied to our circuit, P1 is inverted in regular working condition where inducer is present, recombinase catalyzes the cleavage of each cognate recognition sites attB and attP, inverting the orientation of P1 and rejoining the circuit at attL and attR respectively. Due to the fact that irreversible recombinase can only flip the DNA in one direction, the inverted P1 which is inhibited in working condition where inducer is present remains inverted even when the recombinase is not expressed as inducer is absent. When the inducer is absent, R1 doesn’t inhibit the expression of the inverted P1 anymore, the toxin in the second layer can be then expressed and conduct suicide. The inversion is a permanent effect on the bistable system, that is to say even if we stimulate the whole system again by adding inducer, P1 will not switch its orientation back.
Experiment & Results
We used pBAD and PLtetO as promoters to regulate the expression of the three recombinases in order to test the effect flipping over the promoter J23119 (P1) by the three recombinases and to see if there is expression leakage.
Theoretically speaking, when inducer is present, recombinase should be expressed and successfully reverts the promoter P1 in-between, the bacterium will express mRFP, displaying red color; while if no inducer is present, the inhibitory effect the transcriptional factor exerts on P2 will stop the expression of recombinase, P1 fails to reverse, the bacterium will therefore express sfGFP, displaying green color.
In the plating medium with no inducer, the leaked expression of recombinase reverted the promoter J23119, displaying red color. Comparing the three sets of recombinases(Fig. 1&2&3), we found that TP901 has the lowest expression leakage.
Then we used pBAD to test the recombinases’ working efficiency in inducer’s presence through flow cytometry. Results are quantitatively shown in the diagrams below.
Figure 4: The x-axis of each small square represents the fluorescence of GFP, while the y-axis represents the fluorescence of RFP. All of them show expression
leakage in inducer present and absent. (e.g. for PhiC31, according figures in the second row, dispersed high fluorescence of both RFP and GFP in most of the cells show that there is expression leakage of the recombinase both before and after flipping over the recombinase).
Improvement
In order to improve the expression leakage of the Bxb1 and phiC31 which has considerably expression leakage (from 2017 Peking iGEM part), we decreased the strength of the RBS in front of the recombinase by two commonly used methods (figure 5):
1. For Bxb1, we calculated strengths of different RBS using RBS calculator and built up an RBS library to gain the weakest RBS strength and thereby reduced the expression leakage of Bxb1.
2. For PhiC31, we mutated the original RBS sequence, screened them and changed the start codon of RBS from ATG to GTG in order to reduce recombinase expression leakage levels. We chose the optimal one and retested them.
After the improvement we retested them again quantitatively by flow cytometry. Six graphs shown below demonstrated little expression leakage before and after the expression of recombinase, since fluorescence of most cells concentrates at either high fluorescence of GFP in inducer’s present, before flipping, or high fluorescence of RFP in inducer’s absent, after flipping.
Fig. 6
Discussion
Our recombinases can effectively invert the in-between promoter under our design and experimental validation. This feature works well as a reactor for changes in the external environment. It permanently changes the sequence of genes and thus the direction of gene expression, which implements our goal of connecting two bistable system and exerting permanent effect on the circuit.
The expression of RFP corresponds with the “0” state when applied to our circuit, where the bacterium hasn’t entered its working condition; while the expression of GFP after P1 has been reversed corresponds with the “standby” state in our circuit. That’s the reason why we improved the expression leakage of the irreversible recombinase in order to ensure that no leaked recombinase is present in inducer’s presence which may accidentally initiates the expression of toxin.
References
【1】LWOFF, A. Lysogeny. Bacteriol. Rev. 17, 269–337 (1953)
【2】Campbell A. (2006) in The Bacteriophages, General aspects of lysogeny, ed Calendar R. (Oxford University Press, Oxford), 2nd edn, pp 66–73.
【3】Myers, C. J. Engineering Genetic Circuits. 306 (CRC Press, 2009)
【4】Campbell A. (1962) Episomes. Adv. Genet. 11:101–145.Web of Science
【5】Azaro M.A., Landy A. (2002) in Mobile DNA II, λ integrase and the λ Int family, eds Craig N.L., Craigie R., Gellert M., Lambowitz A.M. (ASM Press, Washington, DC), pp 118–148.
【6】Yueju Wang. Recombinase technology: applications and possibilities. Plant Cell Rep. 2011 Mar; 30(3): 267–285.
【7】Gretchen Meinke. Cre Recombinase and Other Tyrosine Recombinases. Chem. Rev., 2016, 116 (20), pp 12785–12820.
【8】Grindley N D F, Whiteson K L, Rice P A. Mechanisms of site-specific recombination. Annu Rev Biochem, 2006, 75: 567—605
【9】Hsu P L, Ross W, Landy A. The λ-phage att site: functional limits and interaction with Int protein. Nature, 1980, 285: 85—91
【10】Abremski K, Gottesman S. Site-specific recombination: Xis-independent excisive recombination of bacteriophage λ. J Mol Biol, 1981, 153: 67—78
【11】Abremski K, Hoess R. Bacteriophage P1 site-specific recombination: purification and properties of the Cre recombinase protein. J Biol Chem, 1984, 259: 1509—1514
【12】Decapentaplegic and growth control in the developing Drosophila wing. Takuya Akiyama & Matthew C. Gibson. Nature 527, 375–378 (19 November 2015) doi:10.1038/nature15730
【13】Alexandra Pokhilko et al. The mechanism of ϕC31 integrase directionality: experimental analysis and computational modelling. Nucleic Acids Research, pp. gkw616, 2016, ISSN 0305-1048.
【14】Nathaniel Roquet1, Ava P. Soleimany, Alyssa C. Ferris, Scott Aaronson, Timothy K. Lu. Synthetic recombinase-based state machines in living cells. Science 22 Jul 2016: Vol. 353, Issue 6297
【15】Piro Siuti, John Yazbek, Timothy K Lu. Synthetic circuits integrating logic and memory in living cells. Nature Biotechnology 31, 448–452 (2013)
【16】Benjamin H Weinberg et al. Large-scale design of robust genetic circuits with multiple inputs and outputs for mammalian cells. Nature Biotechnology 35, 453–462 (2017) doi:10.1038/nbt.3805
【17】Jesus Fernandez-Rodriguez，Lei Yang，Thomas E. Gorochowski，D. Benjamin Gordon，Christopher A. Voigt. Memory and Combinatorial Logic Based on DNA Inversions: Dynamics and Evolutionary Stability. ACS Synth. Biol., 2015, 4 (12), pp 1361–1372.