Difference between revisions of "Team:Vilnius-Lithuania"

m
m
Line 698: Line 698:
 
                     <h1>Public engagement<br>
 
                     <h1>Public engagement<br>
 
                     AND human practices</h1>
 
                     AND human practices</h1>
−
                     <p>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Donec non vulputate nunc, id dignissim lacus. Proin sodales nunc sit amet eros suscipit, nec condimentum turpis dapibus. Nullam vitae tortor ut augue tempus tempus commodo ut enim. Integer faucibus non enim eu hendrerit. Praesent sed lacinia ante, at imperdiet eros. Morbi elementum dolor nibh, ac aliquet odio dictum at. Fusce urna sapien, commodo non convallis et, interdum sit amet lorem. In tincidunt bibendum nisl a placerat. Class aptent taciti sociosqu ad litora torquent per conubia nostra, per inceptos himenaeos. </p>                
+
                     <p>The beginning of 2019 was marked by a WHO statement exposing a health crisis caused by the movement of anti-vaccination. In February we witnessed the pinnacle of this movement in Lithuania, where it manifested through the outbreak of measles. It came to light that many people are having doubts about the validity of scientific findings, and, therefore, turn to other sources for information, for example, famous people in the media, who have little to no scientific knowledge. People do not take science seriously and these views are both manifested and fueled through the media. Naturally, we raised a question – what is the cause of the miscommunication and disagreement? What is the main culprit of science skepticism? </p>  
 +
                    <a href="https://2019.igem.org/Team:Vilnius-Lithuania/Public_Engagement">READ MORE</a>
 
                 </div>
 
                 </div>
 
             </div>
 
             </div>

Revision as of 14:27, 18 October 2019

Project Description

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Donec non vulputate nunc, id dignissim lacus. Proin sodales nunc sit amet eros suscipit, nec condimentum turpis dapibus. Nullam vitae tortor ut augue tempus tempus commodo ut enim. Integer faucibus non enim eu hendrerit. Praesent sed lacinia ante, at imperdiet eros. Morbi elementum dolor nibh, ac aliquet odio dictum at. Fusce urna sapien, commodo non convallis et, interdum sit amet lorem. In tincidunt bibendum nisl a placerat. Class aptent taciti sociosqu ad litora torquent per conubia nostra, per inceptos himenaeos.



Software.
Metagenomic mining

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Donec non vulputate nunc, id dignissim lacus. Proin sodales nunc sit amet eros suscipit, nec condimentum turpis dapibus. Nullam vitae tortor ut augue tempus tempus commodo ut enim. Integer faucibus non enim eu hendrerit. Praesent sed lacinia ante, at imperdiet eros. Morbi elementum dolor nibh, ac aliquet odio dictum at. Fusce urna sapien, commodo non convallis et, interdum sit amet lorem. In tincidunt bibendum nisl a placerat. Class aptent taciti sociosqu ad litora torquent per conubia nostra, per inceptos himenaeos.



Modeling

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Donec non vulputate nunc, id dignissim lacus. Proin sodales nunc sit amet eros suscipit, nec condimentum turpis dapibus. Nullam vitae tortor ut augue tempus tempus commodo ut enim. Integer faucibus non enim eu hendrerit. Praesent sed lacinia ante, at imperdiet eros. Morbi elementum dolor nibh, ac aliquet odio dictum at. Fusce urna sapien, commodo non convallis et, interdum sit amet lorem. In tincidunt bibendum nisl a placerat. Class aptent taciti sociosqu ad litora torquent per conubia nostra, per inceptos himenaeos.



Public engagement
AND human practices

The beginning of 2019 was marked by a WHO statement exposing a health crisis caused by the movement of anti-vaccination. In February we witnessed the pinnacle of this movement in Lithuania, where it manifested through the outbreak of measles. It came to light that many people are having doubts about the validity of scientific findings, and, therefore, turn to other sources for information, for example, famous people in the media, who have little to no scientific knowledge. People do not take science seriously and these views are both manifested and fueled through the media. Naturally, we raised a question – what is the cause of the miscommunication and disagreement? What is the main culprit of science skepticism?

READ MORE

↑ ☰ ✕