Project
Results
Vibrio - Wet lab
| Week | Experiment | Participents | Description | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week | Experiment | Participents | Description | Results |
| Week 23 06/03/2019-06/09/2019 |
ptRNA_backbone -Ligation | Benedikt Schober | The linearized fragment from IDT was ligated using the T4-Ligase. Afterwards the ligated ptRNA-backbone was transformed in E. coli Dh5a cells. | https://2019.igem.org/wiki/images/a/af/T--Stuttgart--ptRNA_backbone.png |
| Week 24 06/10/2019-06/16/2019 |
Amplifaction of tRNA-Fragments | Kai Schülke ,Jan Müller | The tRNA fragments were synthetized by IDT and amplified by PCR. | The PCR was sucessful. The DNA was checked and purified via agarose gel electrophoresis. |
| Week 25 06/17/2019-06/23/2019 |
competent cells Vibrio natriegens DSM759 | Benedikt Schober, Katharina Kocher | competent Vibrio natriegens DSM 759 were made according to iGEM Marburg 2018 | Competent vibrio natriegens DSM 759 cells were checked on performance via transformation of the sfGFP-Vector. |
| Week 26 06/24/2019-06/30/2019 |
competent cells Escherichia coli DH5a | Kai Schülke, Benedikt Schober, Katharina Kocher | chemically and electro-competent Escherichia coli DH5a cells were made. | Competent escherichia coli cells were checked on performance via transformation of a pUC19a Vector. |
| Week 27 07/01/2019-07/07/2019 |
growth curve V.natriegens in BHIN | Jan Müller, Jan Seeger, Katharina Kocher | Growth curves of the new Vibrio natriegens DSM 759 in BHIN without plasmid. | The resulting growth curve is shown below. |
| Week 28 07/08/2019-07/14/2019 |
Cloning of tRNA fragments into ptRNA_backbone | Katharina Kocher, Benedikt Schober | The ptRNA_backbone and the tRNA fragments AGA, AGG, CGG, TGC, TCC and the combined tRNA fragment were digested using the restriction enzymes XbaI and SpeI. After purification the digested fragments were ligated using the T4 DNA ligase. | Following transformation into DH5α revealed no successful cloning. The colonies obtained showed no insert in an agarose gel and only ptRNA_backbone. |
| Week 29 07/15/2019-07/21/2019 |
Cloning of tRNA fragments into ptRNA_backbone | Katharina Kocher, Benedikt Schober | The ptRNA_backbone and the tRNA fragments AGA, AGG, CGG, TGC, TCC and the combined tRNA fragment were digested using the restriction enzymes PstI and EcoRI. After purification the digested fragments were ligated using the T4 DNA ligase. | Following transformation into DH5α revealed no successful cloning. The colonies obtained showed no insert in an agarose gel and only ptRNA_backbone. |
| Week 30 07/22/2019-07/28/2019 |
Plasmid-Preperation, Agarose-Gel, Agarose-Gel-Extraction, Clean and Concentrator Kit | Katharina Kocher, Benedikt Schober | The ptRNA_backbone and the tRNA fragments AGA, AGG, CGG, TGC, TCC and the combined tRNA fragment were digested using the restriction enzymes PstI and EcoRI. After purification the digested fragments were ligated using the T4 DNA ligase. | Following transformation into DH5α revealed no successful cloning. The colonies obtained showed no insert in an agarose gel and only ptRNA_backbone. |
| Week 31 07/29/2019-08/04/2019 |
Cloning of tRNA fragements into pSB1C3 | Katharina Kocher; Benedikt Schober | The vector pSB1C3 and the tRNA fragments AGA, AGG, CGG, TGC, TCC and the combined tRNA fragment were digested using the restriction enzymes XbaI and SpeI. After purification the digested fragments were ligated using the T4 DNA ligase. Following transformation into DH5α revealed no successful cloning. | Following transformation into DH5α revealed no successful cloning. The colonies obtained showed no insert in an agarose gel and only pSB1C3. |
| Week 32 08/05/2019-08/11/2019 |
Cloning of tRNA fragments into pSB1C3 | Katharina Kocher; Benedikt Schober | The vector pSB1C3 and the tRNA fragments AGA, AGG, CGG, TGC, TCC and the combined tRNA fragment were digested using the restriction enzymes XbaI and SpeI. After purification the digested fragments were ligated using the T4 DNA ligase. Following transformation into DH5α revealed no successful cloning. | Following transformation into DH5α revealed no successful cloning. The colonies obtained showed no insert in an agarose gel and only pSB1C3. |
| Week 33 08/12/2019-08/18/2019 |
Cloning of tRNA fragments into pSB1C3 | Katharina Kocher; Benedikt Schober | The vector pSB1C3 and the tRNA fragments AGA, AGG, CGG, TGC, TCC and the combined tRNA fragment were digested using the restriction enzymes EcoRI and PstI. After purification the digested fragments were ligated using the T4 DNA ligase. Following transformation into DH5α revealed no successful cloning. | Following transformation into DH5α revealed no successful cloning. The colonies obtained showed no insert in an agarose gel and only pSB1C3. |
| Week 34 08/19/2019-08/25/2019 |
Cloning of tRNA fragments into pSB1C3 | Katharina Kocher; Benedikt Schober | The vector pSB1C3 and the tRNA fragments AGA, AGG, CGG, TGC, TCC and the combined tRNA fragment were digested using the restriction enzymes EcoRI and PstI. After purification the digested fragments were ligated using the T4 DNA ligase. Following transformation into DH5α revealed no successful cloning. | Following transformation into DH5α revealed no successful cloning. The colonies obtained showed no insert in an agarose gel and only pSB1C3. |
| Week 35 08/26/2019-09/01/2019 |
Cloning of tRNA fragments into pSB1C3 | Katharina Kocher; Benedikt Schober | After a re-synthesis of the ptRNA_backbone, the tRNA fragments AGA, AGG, CGG, TGC, TCC,the combined tRNA fragment and the pTRNA_backbone were digested using the restriction enzymes EcoRI and PstI. After purification the digested fragments were ligated using the T4 DNA ligase. Following transformation into DH5α revealed no successful cloning. | Following transformation into DH5α revealed no successful cloning. The colonies obtained showed no insert in an agarose gel and only ptRNA_backbone. |
| Week 36 09/02/2019-09/08/2019 |
Cloning of tRNA fragments into ptRNA_backbone | Katharina Kocher; Benedikt Schober | After a re-synthesis of the ptRNA_backbone, the tRNA fragments AGA, AGG, CGG, TGC, TCC,the combined tRNA fragment and the pTRNA_backbone were digested using the restriction enzymes EcoRI and PstI. After purification the digested fragments were ligated using the T4 DNA ligase. Following transformation into DH5α revealed no successful cloning. | Following transformation into DH5α revealed no successful cloning. The colonies obtained showed no insert in an agarose gel and only ptRNA_backbone. |
| Week 37 09/09/2019-09/15/2019 |
Cloning of tRNA fragments into ptRNA_backbone | Katharina Kocher; Benedikt Schober | After a re-synthesis of the ptRNA_backbone, the tRNA fragments AGA, AGG, CGG, TGC, TCC,the combined tRNA fragment and the pTRNA_backbone were digested using the restriction enzymes EcoRI and PstI. After purification the digested fragments were ligated using the T4 DNA ligase. Following transformation into DH5α revealed no successful cloning. | Following transformation into DH5α revealed no successful cloning. The colonies obtained showed no insert in an agarose gel and only ptRNA_backbone. |
| Week 38 09/16/2019-09/22/2019 |
Cloning of tRNA fragments into ptRNA_backbone | Katharina Kocher; Benedikt Schober | After a re-synthesis of the ptRNA_backbone, the tRNA fragments AGA, AGG, CGG, TGC, TCC,the combined tRNA fragment and the pTRNA_backbone were digested using the restriction enzymes EcoRI and PstI. After purification the digested fragments were ligated using the T4 DNA ligase. Following transformation into DH5α revealed no successful cloning. | Following transformation into DH5α revealed no successful cloning. The colonies obtained showed no insert in an agarose gel and only ptRNA_backbone. |
| Week 39 09/23/2019-09/29/2019 |
gDNA Isolation | Benedikt Schober | The tRNA fragments AGA, AGG, CGG, TGC, TCC were amplified from the Vibrio natriegens DSM 759 genome chr.1. | The PCR was succesfully checked by agarose gel electrophoresis. |
| Week 40 09/30/2019-10/06/2019 |
Cloning of tRNA fragments into ptRNA_backbone | Katharina Kocher; Sabrina Holl | Cloning of the tRNA fragments into the ptRNA_backbone was performed using Gibson Assembly. Overhangs were introduced by PCR and Gibson assembly was performed according to the NEB Gibson Assembly protocol. | Following transformation into DH5α revealed no successful cloning. The colonies obtained showed no insert in an agarose gel and only ptRNA_backbone. |
| Mutagenisis of sfGFP, improvement of Gfp and sfGfp biobricks for vibrio natriegens | Katharina Kocher, Sabrina Holl, Hannah Berreth, Verena Haug | Tags of rare Codons (AGA, AGG, CGG, TGC, TCC) were introduced into the sfGFP vector using PCR. The sfGFP with tags of rare codons was transformed into DH5α. | Following transformation into DH5α revealed no successful cloning. No colonies were obtained after transformation. | |
| Week 41 10/07/2019-10/13/2019 |
Improvement of Gfp and sfGfp biobricks for vibrio natriegens | Hannah Berreth, Verena Haug | ||
| Week 42 10/14/2019-10/20/2019 |
Improvement of Gfp and sfGfp biobricks for vibrio natriegens | Hannah Berreth, Verena Haug | ||
| Expression of improved GFP and sfGFP in Vibrio natriegens | Marvin Bubeck, Jan Müller | |||
| Cloning of tRNA fragments into ptRNA_backbone | Katharina Kocher; Sabrina Holl | Cloning of the tRNA fragments into the ptRNA_backbone was performed according to the NEBuilder HiFi DNA Assembly protocol. | Following transformation into DH5α revealed no successful cloning. No colonies were obtained. | |
| Transformation of pRARE plasmid in Vibrio natriegens and growth curves | Katharina Kocher; Sabrina Holl | The pRARE plasmid was prepared from E.coli Rosetta and transformed into Vibrio natriegens. Growth curves of the wild type Vibrio natriegens and Vibrio natriegens cells with pRARE were performed. | Growth curves reveald no differences in growth velocity between wild type Vibrio natriegens and Vibrio natriegens cells with pRARE. | |
| Transformation of sfGFP containing tags of rare codons into Vibrio natriegens. | Katharina Kocher; Sabrina Holl | Tags of rare Codons (AGA, AGG, CGG, TGC, TCC) were introduced into the sfGFP vector using PCR. The sfGFP with tags of rare codons was transformed into Vibrio natriegens. | Following transformation into Vibrio natriegens revealed no successful cloning. No colonies were obtained after transformation. | |
| competent cells Vibrio natriegens DSM759 | Jannis Stadager, Dimitri Graf | competent Vibrio natriegens DSM 759 were made according to iGEM Marburg 2018 | Competent vibrio natriegens DSM 759 cells were checked on performance via transformation of the pRARE plasmid performed by Katharina Kocher and Sabrina Holl |
Vibrio - Biobrik
| Week | Experiment | Participents | Description | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week | Experiment | Participents | Description | Results |
| Week 40 09/30/2019-10/06/2019 |
Biobrick charakterisation | Sini Münßinger, Katharina Hofer, Jan Seeger | Plamsid DNA was transformed in E. coli MG1655 via electroporation. | |
| Week 41 10/07/2019-10/13/2019 |
Biobrick charakterisation | Sini Münßinger, Katharina Hofer, Jan Seeger | For the characterisation, E. coli was cultivated and the RNA purificated by Zymo Quick RNA. During the cultivation, mRFP fluorescence was measured. qPCR was performed to quantify the mRNA amount of mRFP. | |
| Week 42 10/14/2019-10/20/2019 |
Biobrick charakterisation | Sini Münßinger, Katharina Hofer, Jan Seeger |
Vibrio - qPCR
| Week | Experiment | Participents | Description | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week | Experiment | Participents | Description | Results |
| Week 26 06/24/2019-06/30/2019 |
Vibrio natriegens glycerol stocks | Katharina Hofer | Based on a lyophilized Vibrio natriegens pellet, glycerol stocks were produced. | |
| Week 27 07/01/2019-07/07/2019 |
||||
| Week 28 07/08/2019-07/14/2019 |
||||
| Week 29 07/15/2019-07/21/2019 |
||||
| Week 30 07/22/2019-07/28/2019 |
||||
| Week 31 07/29/2019-08/04/2019 |
||||
| Week 32 08/05/2019-08/11/2019 |
RNA purification of Vibrio natriegens wildtyp | Sini Münßinger, Katharina Hofer, Jan Seeger | Comparison of two different RNA purification kits: Zymo Quick RNA (Zymo Research) and Nucleospin miRNA (Macherey &Nagel;kit is able to purificate small RNA (>200nt). | |
| Week 33 08/12/2019-08/18/2019 |
First execution of whole protocol | Sini Münßinger, Katharina Hofer, Jan Seeger | The whole protocol was carried out for the first time. RNA purificated by both kits was used. qPCR was performed with KAPA mastermix. qPCR with the cDNA based on the M&N RNA was performed again, PCR products were sequenzed by Eurofins. | Melting curve showed several amplification products based on the RNA of Zymo kit. RNA purificated by M&N kit will used for further experiments because the meltling curve showd only one amplification product. Each tRNA species showed different ct-values. PCR products were loaded on a gel, but the amplificates were shorter than the expected length. Results of sequencing showed no amplification of the complete sequence (adapter and tRNA). |
| Week 34 08/19/2019-08/25/2019 |
qPCR with GreenMasterMix | Sini Münßinger, Katharina Hofer, Jan Seeger | Ligation and reverse transcrition were performed. GreenMasterMix (Genaxxon) was used for the qPCR. qPCR products were sequenzed again. | Each tRNA species showed different ct-values. PCR products were loaded on a gel, but the amplificates were shorter than the expected length. Results of sequencing showed no amplification of the complete sequence (adapter and tRNA). |
| Week 35 08/26/2019-09/01/2019 |
qPCR with GreenMasterMix | Sini Münßinger, Katharina Hofer, Jan Seeger | Ligation and reverse transcrition were performed. GreenMasterMix (Genaxxon) was used for the qPCR. | Each tRNA species showed different ct-values. PCR products were loaded on a gel, but the amplificates were shorter than the expected length. |
| Week 36 09/02/2019-09/08/2019 |
Comparison of tRNA concentration after different times of cultivation | Sini Münßinger, Katharina Hofer, Jan Seeger | Vibrio was cultivated as usual, samples were taken after 1,5h (mid exponential phase) and 3h (beginning stationary phase). RNA purification and protocol as usual. In addition purified E.coli tRNA (Merck) was treated as usual to verify the protocol. | No differences between the samples of 1,5h and 3h regarding the ct-values. PCR products were loaded on a gel, but the amplificates were shorter than the expected length. |
| Week 37 09/09/2019-09/15/2019 |
Comparison of tRNA concentration after different times of cultivation | Sini Münßinger, Katharina Hofer, Jan Seeger | Vibrio was cultivated as usual, samples were taken after 1,5h (mid exponential phase) and 3h (begin stationary phase). RNA purification and protocol as usual. In addition purified E.coli tRNA (Merck) was treated as usual to verify the protocol. | No differences between the samples of 1,5h and 3h regarding the ct-values. PCR products were loaded on a gel, but the amplificates were shorter than the expected length. |
| Week 38 09/16/2019-09/22/2019 |
Sini Münßinger, Katharina Hofer, Jan Seeger | |||
| Week 39 09/23/2019-09/29/2019 |
Dilution experiment, preparation of E. coli experiment | Sini Münßinger, Katharina Hofer, Jan Seeger | Verification of the possibilty to determine different tRNA concentrations. Purified V. natriegens tRNA was diluted 1:1, 1:10, 1:100. Sample preparation and qPCR protocol as usual. E. coli Bl21 DE3 and E. coli Bl21 DE3 pRARE were cultivated in 2YT-medium. Cells were harvested after 2,5h, 3,5h and 5,5h and stored at -70°C. | Differences between tRNA concentrations are detectable by ct-value. |
| Week 40 09/30/2019-10/06/2019 |
Dilution experiment, comparison of Ecoli BL21 DE3 and pRARE | Sini Münßinger, Katharina Hofer, Jan Seeger | Diltion experiment was performend with all tRNA species in triplicates. Samples were pipetted by Dispendix. Comparison of tRNA concentration of Ecoli BL21 DE3 and BL21 DE3 pRARE. | Differences between tRNA concentrations are detectable by ct-value. No differences between E. coli BL21 DE3 and BL21 DE3 pRARE. |
| Week 40 09/30/2019-10/06/2019 |
Implementation of Hotscriptase, | Sini Münßinger, Katharina Hofer, Jan Seeger | Because of the implementation of Hotscriptase (Genaxxon) a new protocol was developed. Treatment of all tRNA species of V. natriegens and Ecoli BL21 DE3 and BL21 DE3 pRARE with new Hotscriptase protocol. | Each tRNA species showed different ct-values. PCR products were loaded on a gel, but the amplificates were shorter than the expected length. qPCR showed different ct-values for the tRNA species of E. coli BL21 DE3 and BL21 DE3 pRARE. The results obtained were not as expected. |
| Week 41 10/07/2019-10/13/2019 |
Cultivation and tRNA quantification of E. coli Rosetta | Sini Münßinger, Katharina Hofer, Jan Seeger | tRNA concentation of E. coli BL21 DE3 wildtype, pRARE and Rosetta was quantified and compared via qPCR. | qPCR showed different ct-values for the tRNA species of E. coli BL21 DE3, BL21 DE3 pRARE and Rosetta. The results obtained were not as expected. |
| Week 42 10/14/2019-10/20/2019 |
qRT-PCR for the relative quantification of specific tRNA-species
Alongside with the generation of a climate-friendly medium, the goal of our project PhyCoVi was to optimize the strain Vibrio natriegens for a potential use in the biotech industry. The optimization is performed on the genomic level to increase the intracellular availability of tRNA species. As a result, the strain’s performance to express heterologous proteins is enhanced.
A method needs to be developed to quantify individual tRNA species specifically to prove the increased expression not only on the protein level. Multiple methods can be found to quantify non-coding RNA 1, 2 or total tRNA concentration 3, 4. Whereas finding a well-established method to quantify single tRNA species specifically is in vain. The only method paper was published in the journal “RNA biology” in 2015 by Honda et al.: “Four-leaf clover qRT-PCR: A convenient method for selective quantification of mature tRNA” 5. The authors of this paper removed the amino acid at the 3’ end followed by hybridization and ligation with a DNA/RNA hybrid stem loop creating a “four-leaf clover” shaped appearance of the tRNA ligation product. The stem loop adaptor contained a TaqMan probe binding site. During the qPCR the TaqMan probe was cut by exonuclease function of the used polymerase resulting in emission of fluorescence.
Building on the work of Honda et al. we developed a new and simplified method for relative quantification of specific tRNA species without the necessity of TaqMan probes. Instead using a DNA/RNA hybrid stem loop we used a linear DNA/RNA construct as adaptor.
The first step is to isolate RNA with a length of < 200 nt from cultured V. natriegens cells. Then, the amino acid bound to the 3’ end needs to be removed by a deacylation reaction. This results in a sticky end, where a linear RNA/DNA hybrid adaptor can be ligated, which is complementary to the 3’ end overhang. Although different tRNAs show differences in length and sequence, the last three nucleotides at the 3’ end are the same for all tRNA species. The ligated adaptor contains a binding site for the forward-primer, which is identical for all tRNAs (unspecific primer). We used T4-RNA-ligase 2 that requires ATP. For this reason, a polynucleotide kinase was necessary to carry out a phosphorylation reaction at the 5’ end.
To amplify single tRNA species specifically, we distinguished between two options. First option was using the specific tRNA primer in a reverse transcription to convert the whole tRNA pool to cDNA. Following RNase H digestion results in pure cDNA of the desired tRNA species.
Later the desired tRNA species is amplified during a qPCR by using the specific reverse primer and the unspecific adaptor primer.
During qPCR a DNA-intercalating fluorescence dye (Green DNA dye) allows for relative quantification: Green DNA dye binds to double stranded DNA and absorbs blue light and emits green light. The more double stranded DNA is generated, the higher the resulting fluorescence. And the higher the concentration of the template in the sample the faster the fluorescence exceeds the threshold. The number of cycles at which this happens is called the threshold cycle (Ct). (e.g. if sample A showed a Ct of 8 and sample B showed a Ct of 11, sample A contained 23 = 8 times more template.)
After running a DNA gel, we noticed that the obtained amplification products did not show the expected length. This may have been a result of distinct secondary structures of the tRNA species: the reverse transcription reaction was performed at 42 °C which is the enzyme’s optimum working temperature. However, this temperature is not high enough to prevent secondary structures or to break them up. Therefore, areas with secondary structures may have been inaccessible for the reverse transcriptase resulting in shorter cDNA fragments.
For this reason, we tested a second option to amplify single tRNA species specifically. A modified polymerase together with the specific reverse primer can be used to amplify the desired tRNA species using RNA as a template. This modified polymerase works at temperatures around 65 °C and can use both RNA and DNA as a template. The reverse transcription reaction is thus not needed as a consecutive step anymore. Moreover, the modified enzyme creates the specific cDNA from RNA directly and the high temperature prevents secondary structures. The relative quantification based on Ct values is the same as in the option described before.
References
- I. A. Babarinde, Y. Li, A. P. Hutchins (2019) Computational Methods for Mapping, Assembly and Quantification for Coding and Non-coding Transcripts, Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, Vol. 17, pp 628-637
- D. Jacob, K. Thüring, A. Galliot, V. Marchand, A. Galvanin, A. Ciftci, K. Scharmann, M. Stock, J.‐Y. Roignant, S.A. Leidel, Y. Motorin, R. Schaffrath, R. Klassen, M. Helm (2019) Absolute Quantification of Noncoding RNA by Microscale Thermophoresis, Angewandte Chemie International Edition, Vol. 58, pp 9565 – 9569
- T. S. Stenum, M. A. Sørensen, S. L. Svenningsen (2017) Quantification of the Abundance and Charging Levels of Transfer RNAs in Escherichia coli. Journal of Visual Experiments, Issue 126, e56212
- Y. Guo, A. Bosompem, S.Mohan, B. Erdogan, F.Ye, K. C. Vickers, Q. Sheng, S. Zhao, C. Li, P.-F. Su, M. Jagasia, S. A. Strickland, E. A. Griffiths, A. S. Kim (2015) Transfer RNA detection by small RNA deep sequencing and disease association with myelodysplastic syndromes, BMC Genomics, 16:727
- S. Honda, M. Shigematsu, K. Morichika, A. G. Telonis, Y. Kirino (2015) Four-leaf clover qRT-PCR: A convenient method for selective quantification of mature tRNA, RNA Biology, Vol. 12, pp 501 – 508
Figure 1 - OD-CDW correlation of the algae Chlorella vulgaris. Mean of cellular dry
weight in g/L (n=2) was plotted against the measured optical density at 750 nm. Trend line was shown
in red.
Figure 1 - Cellular dry weight in g/l is plotted against the optical density measured at 750 nm.
The linear fit is shown in blue together with its formula.