Difference between revisions of "Team:Pasteur Paris/Results"

(Prototype team page)
 
m
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Pasteur_Paris}}
+
{{Pasteur_Paris/wiki}}
 
<html>
 
<html>
 +
  <style>
 +
      li.notLI {
 +
        font-family:roboto;
 +
        font-size:20px;
 +
        text-indent:50px;
 +
        font-weight:100;
 +
      }
 +
      div.pages {
 +
        width:80%;
 +
        margin-left:10%;
 +
        background-color:white;
 +
        height:90vh;
 +
        z-index:1;
 +
        display:none;
 +
      }
 +
      div.NCroix{
 +
        background-color:black;
 +
        width:30px;
 +
        height:30px;
 +
        position:relative;
 +
        border-radius:50%;
 +
        top:3%;
 +
        left:95%;
 +
        cursor:pointer;
 +
        color:white;
 +
        z-index:2;
 +
        display:none;
 +
      }
 +
      #fleche {
 +
        transform-origin:50% 13.5%;
 +
      }
 +
      .ent::-webkit-scrollbar {
 +
        width: 5px;
 +
      }
 +
      /* Handle */
 +
      .ent::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb {
 +
        background: #8c8c8c;
 +
        border-radius: 10px 10px;
 +
      }
 +
      .ent::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover{
 +
        cursor:pointer;
 +
      }
 +
      /* Handle on hover */
 +
      .ent::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover {
 +
        background: #2f6a6a;
 +
        cursor:pointer;
 +
      }
 +
      .ARCN-27:hover {
 +
      fill:#ff6666;
 +
        transform:scale(2.5,2.5);
 +
      }
 +
      html {
 +
        scroll-behavior: smooth;
 +
      }
 +
      div.ent {
 +
        overflow-x:hidden;
 +
        overflow-y:scroll;
 +
        width:90%;
 +
        margin-left:7.5%;
 +
        opacity:0;
 +
        transition:0.3s;
 +
        height:85%;
 +
        float:left;
 +
      }
 +
      p.p2N {
 +
      font-family:'Roboto',sans-serif;
 +
      color:white;
 +
      font-size:20px;
 +
      text-align:justify;
 +
      font-weight:100;
 +
      width:90%;
 +
      line-height:1.3em;
 +
      white-space: normal;
 +
    }
 +
    p.p3N{
 +
      font-family:'Roboto',sans-serif;
 +
      color:white;
 +
      font-size:20px;
 +
      text-align:justify;
 +
      font-weight:500;
 +
      width:90%;
 +
      line-height:1.3em;
 +
      white-space: normal;
 +
    }
 +
    p.p1N {
 +
      font-family:'Lato',sans-serif;
 +
      font-size:45px;
 +
      color:white;
 +
      white-space: normal;
 +
    }
 +
    p.date {
 +
      color:black;
 +
      font-family:roboto;
 +
      font-size:30px;
 +
      font-weight:100;
 +
      text-align:justify;
 +
      margin-right:5%;
 +
      width:115px;
 +
      padding:5px;
 +
      border:2px dotted black;
 +
      white-space: normal;
 +
    }
 +
      td.notTD{
 +
      border:1px solid black;
 +
        border-collapse:collapse;
 +
        padding:10px;
 +
      }
 +
     
 +
      tr.NotTR{
 +
      font-family:roboto;
 +
        font-weight:400;
 +
        font-size:20px;
 +
        text-align:center;
 +
        color:white;
 +
        background-color:#3A3A3A;
 +
      }
 +
      tr.notTR{
 +
      font-family:roboto;
 +
        font-weight:400;
 +
        font-size:20px;
 +
        text-align:center;
 +
        color:black;
 +
      }
 +
      table.notTABLE{
 +
        width:90%;
 +
        background-color:null;
 +
        border:1px solid black;
 +
        border-collapse:collapse;
 +
      }
 +
    th.notTH{
 +
      border:1px solid black;
 +
      border-collapse:collapse;
 +
      padding:10px;
 +
    }
 +
    div.d2{
 +
      width:60%;
 +
      margin-left:20%;
 +
    }
 +
    </style>
  
 +
<div id="main" style="position:absolute;width:100%;z-index:-1;top:200px;">
 +
      <div class="d2">
 +
        <p class="p1N"> RESULTS BIO </p>
 +
        <br>
 +
        <br>
 +
        <li class="notLI" style="color:white;font-weight:400"> SELEX </li>
 +
       
 +
        <p class="p2N" style="text-indent:50px;"> Main results : </p>
 +
        <br>
 +
        <p class="p2N"> Our project is based on aptamers which are
 +
          single-stranded DNA able to recognize a specific target with a high
 +
          affinity. In order to find potential aptamers, we choose 2 strains of
 +
          bacteria, S. aureus and E. faecium and we performed 10 rounds of SELEX
 +
          (Systematic Evolution of Ligands by EXponential enrichment) on both
 +
          bacteria. </p>
 +
        <p class="p2N"> After these 10 rounds of SELEX, gel electrophoresis were
 +
          made in order to verify that a high concentration of potential
 +
          aptamers are still present. </p>
 +
        <br><br>
 +
        <img src="https://2019.igem.org/wiki/images/4/48/T--Pasteur_Paris--19.png"
  
<div class="column full_size">
+
          style="background-color:white;width:50%;margin-left:20%;"><br> <br>
<h1>Results</h1>
+
        <p class="p2N"> Figure 1: Gel electrophoresis of 10 rounds of SELEX for
<p>Here you can describe the results of your project and your future plans. </p>
+
          E. faecium The gel is a 4% agarose one and the ladder used was a 50 bp
</div>
+
          ladder from Promega. The gel ran at 120 volts during 1 hour
 
+
          approximately. </p>
 
+
        <p class="p2N"> We can observe that for the candidate aptamers selected
<div class="column third_size" >
+
          against E. faecium we always had a single band throughout the rounds
 
+
          of SELEX (Figure 1). This gel demonstrates that a selection was
<h3>What should this page contain?</h3>
+
          applied on the initial DNA library because the bands are less brighter
<ul>
+
          at the rounds 9 and 10 than the firsts rounds. This suggests that the
<li> Clearly and objectively describe the results of your work.</li>
+
          most part of non-specific aptamers of E. faecium were removed during
<li> Future plans for the project. </li>
+
          the washes made during the SELEX and that the specificity of the
<li> Considerations for replicating the experiments. </li>
+
          potential aptamers for E. faecium may have increased over the rounds.
</ul>
+
        </p>
</div>
+
        <br><br>
 
+
        <img src="https://2019.igem.org/wiki/images/0/08/T--Pasteur_Paris--20.png"
 
+
 
+
 
+
<div class="column two_thirds_size" >
+
<h3>Describe what your results mean </h3>
+
<ul>
+
<li> Interpretation of the results obtained during your project. Don't just show a plot/figure/graph/other, tell us what you think the data means. This is an important part of your project that the judges will look for. </li>
+
<li> Show data, but remember <b>all measurement and characterization data must also be on the part's Main Page on the Registry.</b> Otherwise these data will not be in consideration for any medals or part awards! </li>
+
<li> Consider including an analysis summary section to discuss what your results mean. Judges like to read what you think your data means, beyond all the data you have acquired during your project. </li>
+
</ul>
+
</div>
+
 
+
 
+
<div class="clear extra_space"></div>
+
 
+
 
+
 
+
<div class="column two_thirds_size" >
+
<h3> Project Achievements </h3>
+
 
+
<p>You can also include a list of bullet points (and links) of the successes and failures you have had over your summer. It is a quick reference page for the judges to see what you achieved during your summer.</p>
+
 
+
<ul>
+
<li>A list of linked bullet points of the successful results during your project</li>
+
<li>A list of linked bullet points of the unsuccessful results during your project. This is about being scientifically honest. If you worked on an area for a long time with no success, tell us so we know where you put your effort.</li>
+
</ul>
+
 
+
</div>
+
 
+
 
+
 
+
<div class="column third_size" >
+
<div class="highlight decoration_A_full">
+
<h3>Inspiration</h3>
+
<p>See how other teams presented their results.</p>
+
<ul>
+
<li><a href="http://2014.igem.org/Team:TU_Darmstadt/Results/Pathway">2014 TU Darmstadt </a></li>
+
<li><a href="http://2014.igem.org/Team:Imperial/Results">2014 Imperial </a></li>
+
<li><a href="http://2014.igem.org/Team:Paris_Bettencourt/Results">2014 Paris Bettencourt </a></li>
+
</ul>
+
</div>
+
</div>
+
 
+
  
 +
          style="background-color:white;width:50%;margin-left:20%;">
 +
        <p class="p2N"> Figure 2: Gel electrophoresis of 10 rounds of SELEX for
 +
          S. aureus The gel is a 4% agarose one and the ladder used was a 50 bp
 +
          ladder from Promega. The gel ran at 120 volts during 1 hour
 +
          approximately. </p>
 +
        <p class="p2N"> As the previous one, the figure 2 demonstrates that the
 +
          potential aptamers against S. aureus were selected because the bands
 +
          loses their brightness over the rounds. However, on the round 9, we
 +
          can notice 3 bands instead of one. It may be due to non specific
 +
          amplification of DNA during the PCR. Despite this, it seems that these
 +
          non specific amplifications were removed during the washes because
 +
          they are not revealed during the round 10. So, we may think it will
 +
          not interfere with the candidate aptamers. </p>
 +
        <img src="http://parts.igem.org/wiki/images/9/9a/T--Pasteur_Paris--plasmide_pET28_GFP.png"
  
 +
          style="background-color:white;width:50%;margin-left:20%;">
 +
        <p class="p2N"> Figure 3: Gel electrophoresis of the plasmid pET28:GFP
 +
          at different step of the cloning experiment. The gel is a 1% agarose
 +
          one and the ladder used was a 1 kbp ladder from Thermo Fischer. The
 +
          gel ran at 120 volts during 1 hour approximately. </p>
 +
        <p class="p2N"> On the figure 3, we can observe the different steps of
 +
          the cloning experiment. First of all, the plasmid pET28:GFP was
 +
          digested using the restriction enzymes HindIII and BamHI. We can see a
 +
          decrease on its size around 5 kbp which is a sign that the digestion
 +
          went well. Then, the insert, either aptamers against S. aureus or
 +
          those against E. faecium were ligated into the plasmid in order to
 +
          create the biobrick BBa_K3176020 </p>
 +
        <p class="p2N" style="text-indent:50px"> Sequencing </p>
 +
        <p class="p2N"> 10 rounds of SELEX were performed in order to select
 +
          potential aptamer candidates. These aptamers were cloned into
 +
          pET28:GFP in order to be sequenced as bacterial clones. A total of 15
 +
          bacterial clones for E. faecium and 39 for S. aureus were sequenced.
 +
          Unfortunately, the majority of the sequences obtained did not
 +
          correspond to an aptamer sequence. Only two bacterial clones contained
 +
          the expected 40 nucleotides of our initial library. These two
 +
          sequences were found for E. faecium strain, none was found for
 +
          S.aureus. Here is an histogram showing the sequence for one of these
 +
          two aptamers. </p>
 +
        <img src="https://2019.igem.org/wiki/images/6/6c/T--Pasteur_Paris--sqc.png" width="70%">
 +
        <br><br>
 +
        <p class="p2N">
 +
          Figure 4: Sequencing profile of the aptamer selected against E. faecium
 +
The sequencing was performed by Eurofins genomics after we send them the transformed and isolated clone.
 +
        </p>
 +
        <br><br>
 +
        <p class="p3N">
 +
          Characterization of BBa_K1073022
 +
        </p>
 +
        <p class="p2N">
 +
          We chose to characterize BBa_K1073022, the eforRed chromoprotein, and focus on its fluorescence expression using two techniques: flow cytometry and fluorescence microscopy.
 +
        </p>
 +
       
 +
        <p class="p1N">
 +
          Chemistry
 +
        </p>
 +
        <br>
 +
        <p class="p3N">
 +
          Cyclic voltammetry
 +
        </p>
 +
        <p class="p2N">
 +
          If the aptamers were correctly bound to the electrodes, they should act as a protective layer around the electrodes. When they are not in contact with bacteria, a potential corresponding to PBS is therefore  measured. When bacteria are added, the aptamers change conformation and allow the ions in solution easier access to the electrode: therefore, the overall potential increases.
 +
        </p>
 +
        <p class="p2N">
 +
          The above graph is the usual waveform of a cyclic voltammetry analysis. When sweeping towards higher potentials, the electrochemical species are oxidized, which translates into a peek in current. When sweeping back, the oxidized species are reduced, theoretically yielding an equivalent peak, but in negative current.
 +
We conducted the experiments both with nanotubes-only electrodes, and with aptamer-functionalized electrodes. If we correctly deposited aptamers, they should form a protective layer around the electrode like mentioned previously: therefore, the electrochemical species should have a harder time getting close to the electrode to be oxidized and reduced, and the peaks should be lower in intensity.
  
 +
While no difference was noted in the oxidation peak, it is quite clear that the reduction peak is more intense and slightly shifted towards the lower potentials. This modification occurs on all electrodes for all the strains: it was not predicted by the theory, which states that if the binding was correct, both the oxidation and the reduction peak should be less intense.
 +
The only conclusion we may draw from this experiment is that we have indeed modified the electrodes, all in the same way, but we do not exactly know the state of the surface at this point.
  
 +
The most likely explanation for this inconclusive experiment is that the fixation of the aptamers wasn’t complete. This might be explained by the fact that the drops of the fixating solution evaporated very quickly: some aptamers may therefore not have had time to bind correctly and instead adsorbed unto the nanotubes. The protective layer we had hoped to detect using cyclic voltammetry was therefore not thick enough for us to notice a difference.
 +
        </p>
 +
       
 +
       
 +
      </div>
 +
    </div>
 
</html>
 
</html>

Revision as of 03:30, 22 October 2019

  • Safety
  • Juddging Form
  • Human Pratices

  • Education
    Law
    Events
  • Project
  • Description
    Design
    Results
    Entrepreneurship
    Demonstrate
    Chalenges
    Improve
  • Team
  • Team members
    Collaborations
    Attributions
  • Sciences
  • Notebook
    Results Attributions
  • Awards
  • About Us
  • HUMAN  PRACTICES

    PROJECT

    TEAM

    Picto Sciences

    Sciences

    ecr-v-1
    ecr-p-2
    ecr-v-1
    ecr-p-2
    ecr-p-2
    ecr-p-2
    ecr-v-1
    ecr-p-2
    ecr-p-2
    ecr-v-1
    ecr-p-2
    ecr-v-1
    ecr-p-2
    ecr-p-2
    ecr-v-1
    ecr-p-2
    ecr-v-1
    ecr-p-2

    RESULTS BIO



  • SELEX
  • Main results :


    Our project is based on aptamers which are single-stranded DNA able to recognize a specific target with a high affinity. In order to find potential aptamers, we choose 2 strains of bacteria, S. aureus and E. faecium and we performed 10 rounds of SELEX (Systematic Evolution of Ligands by EXponential enrichment) on both bacteria.

    After these 10 rounds of SELEX, gel electrophoresis were made in order to verify that a high concentration of potential aptamers are still present.





    Figure 1: Gel electrophoresis of 10 rounds of SELEX for E. faecium The gel is a 4% agarose one and the ladder used was a 50 bp ladder from Promega. The gel ran at 120 volts during 1 hour approximately.

    We can observe that for the candidate aptamers selected against E. faecium we always had a single band throughout the rounds of SELEX (Figure 1). This gel demonstrates that a selection was applied on the initial DNA library because the bands are less brighter at the rounds 9 and 10 than the firsts rounds. This suggests that the most part of non-specific aptamers of E. faecium were removed during the washes made during the SELEX and that the specificity of the potential aptamers for E. faecium may have increased over the rounds.



    Figure 2: Gel electrophoresis of 10 rounds of SELEX for S. aureus The gel is a 4% agarose one and the ladder used was a 50 bp ladder from Promega. The gel ran at 120 volts during 1 hour approximately.

    As the previous one, the figure 2 demonstrates that the potential aptamers against S. aureus were selected because the bands loses their brightness over the rounds. However, on the round 9, we can notice 3 bands instead of one. It may be due to non specific amplification of DNA during the PCR. Despite this, it seems that these non specific amplifications were removed during the washes because they are not revealed during the round 10. So, we may think it will not interfere with the candidate aptamers.

    Figure 3: Gel electrophoresis of the plasmid pET28:GFP at different step of the cloning experiment. The gel is a 1% agarose one and the ladder used was a 1 kbp ladder from Thermo Fischer. The gel ran at 120 volts during 1 hour approximately.

    On the figure 3, we can observe the different steps of the cloning experiment. First of all, the plasmid pET28:GFP was digested using the restriction enzymes HindIII and BamHI. We can see a decrease on its size around 5 kbp which is a sign that the digestion went well. Then, the insert, either aptamers against S. aureus or those against E. faecium were ligated into the plasmid in order to create the biobrick BBa_K3176020

    Sequencing

    10 rounds of SELEX were performed in order to select potential aptamer candidates. These aptamers were cloned into pET28:GFP in order to be sequenced as bacterial clones. A total of 15 bacterial clones for E. faecium and 39 for S. aureus were sequenced. Unfortunately, the majority of the sequences obtained did not correspond to an aptamer sequence. Only two bacterial clones contained the expected 40 nucleotides of our initial library. These two sequences were found for E. faecium strain, none was found for S.aureus. Here is an histogram showing the sequence for one of these two aptamers.



    Figure 4: Sequencing profile of the aptamer selected against E. faecium The sequencing was performed by Eurofins genomics after we send them the transformed and isolated clone.



    Characterization of BBa_K1073022

    We chose to characterize BBa_K1073022, the eforRed chromoprotein, and focus on its fluorescence expression using two techniques: flow cytometry and fluorescence microscopy.

    Chemistry


    Cyclic voltammetry

    If the aptamers were correctly bound to the electrodes, they should act as a protective layer around the electrodes. When they are not in contact with bacteria, a potential corresponding to PBS is therefore measured. When bacteria are added, the aptamers change conformation and allow the ions in solution easier access to the electrode: therefore, the overall potential increases.

    The above graph is the usual waveform of a cyclic voltammetry analysis. When sweeping towards higher potentials, the electrochemical species are oxidized, which translates into a peek in current. When sweeping back, the oxidized species are reduced, theoretically yielding an equivalent peak, but in negative current. We conducted the experiments both with nanotubes-only electrodes, and with aptamer-functionalized electrodes. If we correctly deposited aptamers, they should form a protective layer around the electrode like mentioned previously: therefore, the electrochemical species should have a harder time getting close to the electrode to be oxidized and reduced, and the peaks should be lower in intensity. While no difference was noted in the oxidation peak, it is quite clear that the reduction peak is more intense and slightly shifted towards the lower potentials. This modification occurs on all electrodes for all the strains: it was not predicted by the theory, which states that if the binding was correct, both the oxidation and the reduction peak should be less intense. The only conclusion we may draw from this experiment is that we have indeed modified the electrodes, all in the same way, but we do not exactly know the state of the surface at this point. The most likely explanation for this inconclusive experiment is that the fixation of the aptamers wasn’t complete. This might be explained by the fact that the drops of the fixating solution evaporated very quickly: some aptamers may therefore not have had time to bind correctly and instead adsorbed unto the nanotubes. The protective layer we had hoped to detect using cyclic voltammetry was therefore not thick enough for us to notice a difference.