Difference between revisions of "Team:NYU Abu Dhabi/ResultsBio"

Line 587: Line 587:
 
<p style="font-family:avenir;font-size:18px;">As per the figure, SYBR green only showed fluorescence in all the serial dilutions samples containing DNA (with various concentrations). Since these samples fluoresced using only 1μl of SYBR green from a 25x stock, this can reduce the amount needed for amplification detection and reduce the cost in the device.
 
<p style="font-family:avenir;font-size:18px;">As per the figure, SYBR green only showed fluorescence in all the serial dilutions samples containing DNA (with various concentrations). Since these samples fluoresced using only 1μl of SYBR green from a 25x stock, this can reduce the amount needed for amplification detection and reduce the cost in the device.
 
</p><br/><br/>
 
</p><br/><br/>
<h1 id="test">Test Using Bacteria from LB broth</h1><br/><br/>
+
<img src="https://2019.igem.org/wiki/images/2/2c/T--NYU_Abu_Dhabi--bioresults.jpeg" class="img-fluid" /><br />
<p style="font-family:avenir;font-size:18px;">To emulate the scenario of collecting a saliva sample containing bacteria, we performed PCR and RPA experiments directly on bacteria obtained from LB broth. The amplification was tested using the optimized amount of SYBR green.
+
 
</p><br/><br/>
+
<img src="https://2019.igem.org/wiki/images/thumb/d/d7/T--NYU_Abu_Dhabi--2.jpg/926px-T--NYU_Abu_Dhabi--2.jpg" class="img-fluid" />
  
<h4 style="font-family:avenir;">Broth PCR for IS481 and HBcAg</h4><br/>
 
<img src="https://2019.igem.org/wiki/images/3/3e/T--NYU_Abu_Dhabi--resultsbio55.png" class="img-fluid" />
 
<br/>
 
<small style="font-family:avenir;font-size:13px;">Figure 4: SYBR green fluorescence of PCR samples using bacteria from broth.</small>
 
<br/><br/>
 
<p style="font-family:avenir;font-size:18px;">
 
  The SYBR green fluorescence of the negative control (which contains no DNA) was significantly lower than that of the serial dilutions, indicating that DNA was sufficiently amplified. These results with HBcAg and IS481 offer a proof of concept (that also applies to the other disease genes) which verifies that Volatect, which utilizes RPA, is capable of running tests on saliva samples without the need to lyse bacteria using any buffers.
 
</p>
 
<h1 id="detect">Detection Using CRISPR-Cas12a</h1>
 
<br/><br/>
 
<p style="font-family:avenir;font-size:18px;">
 
After the required concentration and volume of the FQ quencher was optimized, the fluorescence using the quencher was tested on both PCR and RPA samples for two reasons: to verify that the DETECTR protocol used by Volatect (RPA+CRISPR+FQ quencher) is functional and to compare the RPA amplification with the currently-used PCR method.
 
</p><br/><br/>
 
  
<img src="https://2019.igem.org/wiki/images/1/1f/T--NYU_Abu_Dhabi--biopageidc.png" class="img-fluid" /><br/>
 
<small style="font-family:avenir;font-size:13px;">
 
Figure 5: Comparison of fluorescence intensity and detection using CRISPR coupled with RPA and with PCR. The results show that the sensitivity of RPA was higher, and a higher fluorescence intensity was observed until 0.001 ng/μl when using RPA with CRISPR.
 
<br/>
 
Top- RPA:60 ng/ul dilution- 25ng/ul dilution- 10 ng/ul dilution- 5 ng/ul dilution- 1 ng/ul dilution- 0.1 ng/ul dilution- 0.01 ng/ul dilution- 0.01 ng/ul dilution
 
 
<br/>
 
<br/>
Bottom- PCR:60 ng/ul dilution- 25ng/ul dilution- 10 ng/ul dilution- 5 ng/ul dilution- 1 ng/ul dilution- 0.1 ng/ul dilution- 0.01 ng/ul dilution- 0.01 ng/ul dilution
 
</small>
 
<br/><br/>
 
<p style="font-family:avenir;font-size:18px;">
 
Figure 5 above shows that the sensitivity of RPA (up to 0.001 ng/μl) was higher than that of PCR (up to 0.1 ng/μl) and the fluorescence was more intense for the RPA samples coupled with CRISPR and quencher compared to PCR. This proves that the protocol utilized by Volatect for pathogen detection, DETECTR, is more sensitive the PCR technique currently used.
 
</p><br/>
 
<p style="font-family:avenir;font-size:18px;">
 
The fluorescence is an indication that the guide RNAs of CRISPR were successfully bound to the target DNA/gene (in this case, IS481). The strong fluorescence of RPA allows the sensors in the device to easily detect the fluorescence when the target pathogen genes are present, making the device as a whole sensitive. This experiment also shows that Volatect can be a reliable tool for testing for presence of pathogens in saliva even when present in small concentrations.
 
</p>
 
  
 
   </div>
 
   </div>

Revision as of 03:56, 22 October 2019

Bio Results

Biology Results