This enabled us to gain insights into the different aspects of our project like:
- a) Idea Formulation
- b) Intended Applications
- c) Ethical Assessment
- d) Communication
- i) “What did we learn from them?”
- ii) “How did we act on their feedback?”
The concept of extending bacteria’s functional lifespan has been an open question in the field of biology and yet, it has not been explored extensively. Given the novelty and benefits it entails, our team believes that through regulating bacteria’s growth, it can potentially address limitations posed by the stochastic nature of bacteria. We formulated our human practice methodology and classified it into 3 main groups:
- i) Idea Formulation
- ii) Ethics and Safety
- iii) Idea formulation
For idea formulation, we read up literature and consulted experts who studied intensively on different Toxin-Antitoxin systems to seek their views on its feasibility as a growth switch. To understand how our platform technology would impact current applications, we interviewed stakeholders in healthcare, biolighting, biosensors and bio-manufacturing. Their feedback pivoted us away from applications that our technology might not be suited for and also shed light on its demand, especially for biosensor companies and people who live in rural areas. We also interviewed individuals on ethics and safety as we identified the need for a biocontainment system for our long living bacteria. Through our HP, we gave due consideration to every voice and consolidated their suggestions, which ultimately spearheaded into integrated human practice.
Click on the dots to find out more!
Idea Formulation
Expert interviews allowed us to draw on a vast amount of specialised knowledge in the most efficient manner.
Who did we interview?
Subject matter experts in the field of synthetic biology
Why did we choose to interview them specifically?
They authored papers that we read during the process of literature review.
What did we want from the interview?
1. To understand the feasibility of our idea (from a technical standpoint)
2. To check the validity of the assumptions we may have made
3. To fill gaps in our technical knowledge
Intended Applications
User interviews helped us to understand the needs and motivations of our potential stakeholders.
Who did we interview?
Clinicians, Companies, Laypeople
Why did we choose to interview them specifically?
We recognised them as potential stakeholders who may be interested in our technology.
What did we want from the interview?
1. To gather insights on the perception of our technology in each application
2. To understand the needs and motivations of our stakeholders
3. To understanding how our technology can better serve our stakeholders for each application
Ethical Assessment
Ethics Flow Charting allowed us to understand the ethical implications of our work by helping us visualise the consequences of each decision.
Who did we interview?
Regulatory authorities, Safety and Bioethics committee members
Why did we choose to interview them specifically?
They have extensive knowledge of existing guidelines and are well-informed about analysing such issues.
What did we want from the interview?
1. To understand the ethical and social implications of our work
2. To create a well-informed ethics flowchart pertaining to our work by filling in the ethical considerations and measures to be taken
The interviews we conducted over the course of the project have been documented in the interactive timelines below. They contain information about how different people have impacted or shaped our project. For the respective individuals, we have included:
- i) The context of the interview;
- ii) The insights that we have gained;
- iii) And how their feedback influenced our project
Click on the dots to find out more!