<p>This page is used by the judges to evaluate your team for the <a href="https://2019.igem.org/Judging/Medals">medal criterion</a> or <a href="https://2019.igem.org/Judging/Awards"> award listed below</a>. </p>
<p> Delete this box in order to be evaluated for this medal criterion and/or award. See more information at <a href="https://2019.igem.org/Judging/Pages_for_Awards"> Instructions for Pages for awards</a>.</p>
During this trip, the research leader complained a lot about the inconvenience and unreliability of the industrial production process. Despite their high level of research, they said that there remained no good pre-analytical way to decide how to improve their process of production. The existing way and tools had too many limits to be used by researchers so that they could only experiment with changes thought out of experience. Also, with careful consideration of environmental protection, they kept on finding ways to improve their products while not impact productive rates.
+
<br><br>
+
We talked a lot with the leader about what we have seen. Naturally, an idea occurred to our mind that we may be able to do something to make the industrial process easier. The leader was glad we had this thought.
+
</div>
+
<h4>Meeting with Prof. Jiong Hong</h4>
+
<div class="passage">
+
After acknowledging the problems faced in the real world, we went to have a meeting with our PI, professor
+
Jiong Hong. Prof. Hong informed us about the existence of Flux Balance Analysis and further researches based
+
on it. Then we had some investigation about FBA, only to find that all existing tools to do FBA lack the
+
ease of use despite the beauty of its method. It first came into our mind to build a great FBA tool that
+
meets the requirements of real production environments.
+
<br>
+
<div class="passage">
+
<div class="passage">
+
<div class="notepaper">
+
<figure class="quote">
+
<blockquote class="curly-quotes">
+
Indeed, there is a huge gap between theoretical production and the real industrial process. however,
+
maybe you can think about one aspect of the production such as Flux Balance Analysis and use linear
Then we visited Wenfei Yu, the leader of team USTC in 2018, and got acknowledged about some common databases
+
used in Syn-Biology and their shortcomings. Also, we became aware of cobrapy, a tool that offers several
+
APIs to do FBA.
+
<br><br>
+
To help us, USTC 2019 team gave us a hand, they helped us invite Pengcen Jiang, who had a good command of Cobra and was one of the USTC 2016. After her careful and patient instruction, we had a comprehensive acknowledge of Cobra, which is of great benefit to our project. </div>
+
<hr>
+
<div class="text-center psgImg" style="text-align: left !important;">
Team USTC has always been enthusiastic to help us test our tool and improve our project. We had done several
+
tests together, during which some small functions, such as optimizations with the display of graphs in the
+
output, comparisions between different but alike models and polishing UI of the interface, were added in.</div>
+
<h4>With SJTU-Software 2019</h4>
+
<div class="passage">After the first period of development, we cooperated with SJSU to test projects for each other. We gained much useful advice, with which we improved our projects. They said we had a very friendly UI; our web design was concise, and the data content was abundant. Our project made high integration between biobricks of iGEM and FBA analysis, so it’s convenient to make better research of the metabolic flux. Also, they gave us some feedback that we still had some defects, and gave us some advice. First, the user should enter a JSON file with metabolite and coefficient to create a reaction. However, it’s unfriendly for users to create JSON files manually. Besides, considering there are plenty of models in our well-integrated database, people don’t need to enter the model id manually but can choose from the known models.</div>
At iGEM we believe societal considerations should be upfront and integrated throughout the design and execution of synthetic biology projects. “Human Practices” refers to iGEM teams’ efforts to actively consider how the world affects their work and the work affects the world. Through your Human Practices activities, your team should demonstrate how you have thought carefully and creatively about whether your project is responsible and good for the world. We invite you to explore issues relating (but not limited) to the ethics, safety, security, and sustainability of your project, and to show how this exploration feeds back into your project purpose, design and execution.
−
</p>
−
−
−
−
<p>For more information, please see the <a href="https://2019.igem.org/Human_Practices">Human Practices Hub</a>. There you will find:</p>
−
−
<ul>
−
<li> an <a href="https://2019.igem.org/Human_Practices/Introduction">introduction</a> to Human Practices at iGEM </li>
−
<li>tips on <a href="https://2019.igem.org/Human_Practices/How_to_Succeed">how to succeed</a> including explanations of judging criteria and advice about how to conduct and document your Human Practices work</li>
−
<li>descriptions of <a href="https://2019.igem.org/Human_Practices/Examples">exemplary work</a> to inspire you</li>
−
<li>links to helpful <a href="https://2019.igem.org/Human_Practices/Resources">resources</a></li>
−
<li>and more! </li>
−
</ul>
−
−
−
−
−
−
<p>On this page, your team should document all of your Human Practices work and activities. You should write about the Human Practices topics you considered in your project, document any activities you conducted to explore these topics (such as engaging with experts and stakeholders), describe why you took a particular approach (including referencing any work you built upon), and explain if and how you integrated takeaways from your Human Practices work back into your project purpose, design and/or execution. </p>
−
−
<p>If your team has gone above and beyond in work related to safety, then you should document this work on your Safety wiki page and provide a description and link on this page. If your team has developed education and public engagement efforts that go beyond a focus on your particular project, and for which would like to nominate your team for the Best Education and Public Engagement Special Prize, you should document this work on your <a href="https://2019.igem.org/Team:USTC-Software/Public_Engagement">Education and Education wiki page</a> and provide a description and link here. </p>
</div>
</div>
−
−
<div class="clear"></div>
−
+
<!--autoMenu css and js files, generate Menu of each article-->
<p>The iGEM judges will review this page to assess whether you have met the Silver and/or Gold medal requirements based on the Integrated Human Practices criteria listed below. If you nominate your team for the <a href="https://2019.igem.org/Judging/Awards">Best Integrated Human Practices Special Prize</a> by filling out the corresponding field in the <a href="https://2019.igem.org/Judging/Judging_Form">judging form</a>, the judges will also review this page to consider your team for that prize.
+
−
</p>
+
−
</div>
+
−
</div>
+
−
<div class="clear extra_space"></div>
+
<!--autoMenu css and js files, generate Menu of each article-->
<p>Convince the judges you have thought carefully and creatively about whether your work is responsible and good for the world. Document how you have investigated these issues, how you engaged with communities relevant to your goals, why you chose this approach, what you have learned, and the potential impact of your project’s success. </p>
<p>Expand on your silver medal activity by demonstrating how you have integrated the investigated issues into the purpose, design, and/or execution of your project. Document your process and describe how your human practices work informed and shaped your project at different stages.
<h3>Best Integrated Human Practices Special Prize</h3>
+
−
+
−
<p>To compete for the Best Integrated Human Practices prize, please describe your work on this page and also fill out the description on the judging form. </p>
+
−
+
−
<p>How does your project affect society and how does society influence the direction of your project? How might ethical considerations and stakeholder input guide your project purpose and design and the experiments you conduct in the lab? How does this feedback enter into the process of your work all through the iGEM competition? Document a thoughtful and creative approach to exploring these questions and how your project evolved in the process to compete for this award!</p>
+
−
+
−
<p>You must also delete the message box on the top of this page to be eligible for this prize.</p>
+
−
+
−
</div>
+
Latest revision as of 03:31, 22 October 2019
Human Practice
Earlier Stage
Visit to Huaheng Biotech
Huaheng Biotech is a company which the leading position around the world, in the field of
alanine products producing using methods of microbiological fermentation. They had put a major capital
investment in research and development. After communicating with their research leader, we took a visit to
their plant and had a meetup with their researchers.
Figure 1: Visit to Huaheng Biotech
During this trip, the research leader complained a lot about the inconvenience and unreliability of the industrial production process. Despite their high level of research, they said that there remained no good pre-analytical way to decide how to improve their process of production. The existing way and tools had too many limits to be used by researchers so that they could only experiment with changes thought out of experience. Also, with careful consideration of environmental protection, they kept on finding ways to improve their products while not impact productive rates.
We talked a lot with the leader about what we have seen. Naturally, an idea occurred to our mind that we may be able to do something to make the industrial process easier. The leader was glad we had this thought.
Meeting with Prof. Jiong Hong
After acknowledging the problems faced in the real world, we went to have a meeting with our PI, professor
Jiong Hong. Prof. Hong informed us about the existence of Flux Balance Analysis and further researches based
on it. Then we had some investigation about FBA, only to find that all existing tools to do FBA lack the
ease of use despite the beauty of its method. It first came into our mind to build a great FBA tool that
meets the requirements of real production environments.
Indeed, there is a huge gap between theoretical production and the real industrial process. however,
maybe you can think about one aspect of the production such as Flux Balance Analysis and use linear
programming to make production.
— Jiong Hong
Figure 2: Meeting with Prof. Jiong Hong
Preliminary product design
We proposed a revolutionary workflow that would greatly improve efficiency and decrease the complexity of
using. In other words, we designed a high-level framework to automatically solve many inner logics and thus
simplify the process of analysis.
We first considered to support a wild and customized searching function based on the optimization of
databases. After a job done by UESTC-Software in 2018, we wanted to do some upgrade of the scale of
databases.
Figure 3: Learn cobra
Then we visited Wenfei Yu, the leader of team USTC in 2018, and got acknowledged about some common databases
used in Syn-Biology and their shortcomings. Also, we became aware of cobrapy, a tool that offers several
APIs to do FBA.
To help us, USTC 2019 team gave us a hand, they helped us invite Pengcen Jiang, who had a good command of Cobra and was one of the USTC 2016. After her careful and patient instruction, we had a comprehensive acknowledge of Cobra, which is of great benefit to our project.
Preliminary product design
Mid-term: A Change of Emphasis
Meetup with SYSU 2019 team
We went to Guangzhou in July and visited the iGEM team of Sun Yat-sen University. In the meetup, we
introduced our projects to each other. At that time, we devoted ourselves to optimize our database which was
at a great scale and then linking the output to FBA’s input. However, our idea hadn’t been fully approved by
the SYSU team and their professor. They put forward that out idea about optimizing massive databases was not
targeted for Synthetic Biology. In other words, there was a bias in our aim, for the work done to optimize
the databases will distract us to design FBA workflow and its efficiency.
Figure 4: Meetup with SYSU team
Figure 5: Downsides of current product
In the emergency meeting that night we all admitted that the problem did exist. Then we decided immediately
a change of emphasis of our project, which would more concentrated on the optimization of FBA and the whole
framework.
Discussion with upperclassmen
He helped us tease out our whole project and his clear thinking impressed us very much. He then raised a
question that whether we can provide a recommendation of Biobricks when we end up giving graphs of analysis.
Figure 6: Discussion with upperclassmen
For example, if modifications and analysis had been done to the user's model based on E. coli, the
researcher can immediately be acknowledged by our system which Biobricks he or she can use. After more
discussion, we found it would be a pretty useful function. So we decided to append our system with a micro
recommendation system for proper Biobricks.
After a change of emphasis
CCIC: Weighing and Cooperating
CCic, which stands for the Conference of China iGEMer Community, is the biggest synthetic biology conference
in China. This year we had a wonderful time there in Shenzhen. We did presentations and our idea was
evaluated by many experts and lovers in the field of synthetic biology. There we were encouraged to expand
our project to a platform, using which users can share their models, and see the history of modifying. It
enriched our project, made it closer to a mature one.
Figure 7: Attending the CCIC meeting
Figure 8: Communication with UESTC
Communication with Tongji 2019
After our presentation, teammates of Tongji 2019 found us and asked whether we can offer some more specific
suggestions, for their project was related to increasing generation rate of products of fermentation.
After knowing that we can only analyze changes of major metabolites’ flux, they were quite disappointed. We
talked to the professors and some senior students there at CCIC and they approved our design.
It is not
unnecessary for a researcher who does flux analysis to do this job, for it should be considered during
experimental design. Your analysis of flux major metabolites is much more useful in a generative
perspective
and considering the accuracy.
Figure 9: Communication
Cooperating with UESTC-Software
During the communication with UESTC-Software 2019, we came up with the idea to build our recommendation
system base on their well-handled data, for they had done a great job in collecting data and optimizing
databases. We then reached cooperation with each other and the first time opened up collaboration lying
deeply in the projects of iGEM Software Teams.
A complete design of our project
Test Run
With USTC 2019
Team USTC has always been enthusiastic to help us test our tool and improve our project. We had done several
tests together, during which some small functions, such as optimizations with the display of graphs in the
output, comparisions between different but alike models and polishing UI of the interface, were added in.
With SJTU-Software 2019
After the first period of development, we cooperated with SJSU to test projects for each other. We gained much useful advice, with which we improved our projects. They said we had a very friendly UI; our web design was concise, and the data content was abundant. Our project made high integration between biobricks of iGEM and FBA analysis, so it’s convenient to make better research of the metabolic flux. Also, they gave us some feedback that we still had some defects, and gave us some advice. First, the user should enter a JSON file with metabolite and coefficient to create a reaction. However, it’s unfriendly for users to create JSON files manually. Besides, considering there are plenty of models in our well-integrated database, people don’t need to enter the model id manually but can choose from the known models.
During this trip, the research leader complained a lot about the inconvenience and unreliability of the industrial production process. Despite their high level of research, they said that there remained no good pre-analytical way to decide how to improve their process of production. The existing way and tools had too many limits to be used by researchers so that they could only experiment with changes thought out of experience. Also, with careful consideration of environmental protection, they kept on finding ways to improve their products while not impact productive rates.
Then we visited Wenfei Yu, the leader of team USTC in 2018, and got acknowledged about some common databases
used in Syn-Biology and their shortcomings. Also, we became aware of cobrapy, a tool that offers several
APIs to do FBA.
In the emergency meeting that night we all admitted that the problem did exist. Then we decided immediately
a change of emphasis of our project, which would more concentrated on the optimization of FBA and the whole
framework.
For example, if modifications and analysis had been done to the user's model based on E. coli, the
researcher can immediately be acknowledged by our system which Biobricks he or she can use. After more
discussion, we found it would be a pretty useful function. So we decided to append our system with a micro
recommendation system for proper Biobricks.
