Awards in iGEM 2019
The following is a list of Awards given by the iGEM Judges and some general information about how Award decisions are made.
For examples of award-winning work, see the 2018 Giant Jamboree Results.
A small number of iGEM teams will be selected by the judges as iGEM Finalists. These teams will be selected based on the overall excellence of their entire iGEM project, including contributions from the quality of the Team Wiki, Poster, and Presentation.
1. Grand Prize Undergraduate
also known as the aluminum BioBrick Trophy; best overall undergraduate team project
2. First Runner-Up Undergraduate
the next highest ranking undergraduate team project
3. Second Runner-Up Undergraduate
the next highest ranking undergraduate team project
1. Grand Prize Overgraduate
also known as the aluminum BioBrick Trophy; best overall overgraduate team project
2. First Runner-Up Overgraduate
the next highest ranking overgraduate team project
1. Grand Prize High School
also known as the BioBrick Trophy; best overall high school team project
Standard Track Awards
The iGEM 2019 judging committee hopes to award the following track awards, conditional on the accomplishments presented by the teams. Each prize will be awarded at the discretion of the judges based on how impressed they are with the level of excellence demonstrated by teams. Below are brief descriptions for each track award.
1. Best Diagnostics Project
Many medical conditions can be successfully treated if only they are diagnosed at an early enough stage. Can your team come up with faster, cheaper and better diagnostics techniques to improve access to medical treatment worldwide?
2. Best Energy Project
World energy consumption has increased by roughly a factor of six since 1950. In May 2013, atmospheric C02 readings taken at the Mauna Loa Observatory in Hawaii surpassed 400 ppm for the first time, an unsustainably high concentration of CO2. Can we use synthetic biology to create energy technologies that produce less CO2, make energy using feedstock and waste materials or otherwise sustainably generate energy?
3. Best Environment Project
The quality of the air, water, and land, both on Earth and other heavenly bodies, limits the happiness of humans and other creatures. Can biotechnology be used to help clean the air, provide fresh drinking water, restore or enhance soil quality, terraform a near-Earth asteroid, or protect, preserve, or enhance natural biological diversity?
4. Best Food & Nutrition Project
People need to eat. Can biotechnology be responsibly used to produce food or nutritional molecules without causing widespread shortages of either, and without harming the environment that future generations will inherit?
5. Best Foundational Advance Project
Just thirty-five years ago, scientists could not cut and paste pre-existing fragments of genetic material like we can today. The discovery and application of DNA recombination allowed us to assemble new genes. The synthetic biology community needs other enabling technologies that help to make new accomplishments possible. What are other types of basic tricks does nature use? Have you discovered and applied one that could revolutionize synthetic biology?
6. Best Information Processing Project
The diversity and abundance of biological properties, behaviors, and parts presents a huge information processing challenge. Has your project led to an innovative system that allows us to navigate and use lots of information quickly and effectively?
7. Best Manufacturing Project
Have you ever heard of nanotechnology? Well, biology is a nanotechnology that already exists, and that actually works. The ribosome is a programmable nanoassembler embedded within a reproducing machine. Could we responsibly use biology to manufacture useful products, from the nanoscale (atoms) to the decascale (buildings and bridges)? What can biology be programmed to manufacture?
8. Best New Application Project
We're guessing that you have great ideas that nobody has ever thought about, or if they have they forgot to tell somebody else. Can you imagine an entirely new application area for biological technology?
9. Best Therapeutics Project
Many health and medical problems can best be addressed with new and novel therapies. What can synthetic biology do to improve techniques, technology and access to new and novel therapies?
There will be a track award distributed to teams in the undergraduate section and one to teams in the overgraduate section on the condition that there are more than 10 teams in each of the sections in the specified track. If there are fewer than 10 teams in either the undergraduate or overgraduate section of a track, the prizes will be combined into one track award.
Special Track Awards
The iGEM 2019 judging committee hopes to award the following new track prizes, conditional on the accomplishments presented by teams. Each prize will be awarded at the discretion of the judges based on how impressed they are with the level of excellence demonstrated by teams.
1. Best Open Project
Teams in the Open Track work on synthetic biology projects that may focus on measurement, hardware, and art & design, as well as other areas. For example, are you exploring a project with a strong focus on Human Practices, policy, safety, or entrepreneurship? Are you doing something completely different that does not fit in any other track focus? Then this may be the right track for your team!
2. Best Software Project
Computers have been around for a long time. Why don't we have more, great software tools to help everyone engineer synthetic biological systems based on standard biological parts?
Special Track teams are not eligible for the corresponding special awards. For example, the software track teams are not eligible for the software special prize. Special track teams are also not eligible for the grand prize.
Special prizes are awarded to honor the most innovative and unique contributions to iGEM. The iGEM 2019 Executive Judging Committee hopes to award the following Special prizes, conditional on the accomplishments presented by the teams. Each prize will be awarded at the discretion of the judges based on how impressed they are with the level of excellence demonstrated by teams.
1. Best Education & Public Engagement
How have you developed new opportunities to include more people in shaping synthetic biology? Innovative educational tools and public engagement activities have the ability to establish a two-way dialogue with new communities by discussing public values and the science behind synthetic biology. Document your approach and what was learned by everyone involved to compete for this award.
2. Best Hardware
This is a prize for the team that has developed a piece of hardware for synthetic biology. Hardware in iGEM should make synthetic biology based on standard parts easier, faster, better or more accessible to our community. Did your team make a sensor to help teams characterize parts? Did you make a robot that can help teams perform experiments or do cloning more easily? Tell us what your team did for this award!
3. Best Integrated Human Practices
How does your project affect society and how does society influence the direction of your project? How might ethical considerations and stakeholder input guide your project purpose and design and the experiments you conduct in the lab? How does this feedback enter into the process of your work all through the iGEM competition? Document a thoughtful and creative approach to exploring these questions and how your project evolved in the process to compete for this award.
4. Best Measurement
There are a lot of exciting Parts in the Registry, but many Parts have still not been characterized. Designing great measurement approaches for characterizing new parts or developing and implementing an efficient new method for characterizing thousands of parts are good examples.
5. Best Model
Models and computer simulations provide a great way to describe the functioning and operation of BioBrick Parts and Devices. Synthetic biology is an engineering discipline and part of engineering is simulation and modeling to determine system behavior before building your design. Designing and simulating can be iterated many times in a computer before moving to the lab. This award is for teams who build a model of their system and use it to inform system design or simulate expected behavior before or in conjunction with experiments in the wetlab.
6. Best New Basic Part
Most genetically-encoded functions have not yet been converted to BioBrick parts. Thus, there are many opportunities to find new, cool, and important genetically encoded functions, and refine and convert the DNA encoding these functions into BioBrick standard biological parts. To be eligible for this award, this part must be well documented on the Main Page on the Part's Page on the Registry.
7. Best New Composite Part
New BioBrick devices can be made by combining existing BioBrick Parts. For example, Inverters, Amplifiers, Smell Generators, Protein Balloon Generators, Senders, Receivers, Actuators, and so on. To be eligible for this award, this part must be well documented on the Main Page on the Part's Page on the Registry.
8. Best Part Collection
Did your team make a lot of great parts? Is there a theme that ties all your parts together? Did you make a CRISPR collection, a MoClo collection, or a collection of awesome pigment parts? Tell the judges you should be evaluated for the Best Part Collection award! To be eligible for this award, these parts must be well documented on the Main Page on the Part's Page on the Registry. See parts BBa_K747000 through BBa_K747095 for an example of a well-documented part collection.
9. Best Plant Synthetic Biology
This award is designed celebrate exemplary work done in plant synthetic biology. Did you build a project in a plant chassis? Did you submit plant parts to the Registry? This award could also be given to a team working with algae or another photosynthetic chassis. Show us what you made and remember to adhere to iGEM safety guidelines!
10. Best Poster
Posters should tell a story, be attractive, have a good balance of text and graphics, and concisely present your team's work. Teams will also be evaluated for their ability to answer questions about their work. Please read over our 2019 poster guidelines for more information on how we are assessing the posters; formatting requirements and expected poster components are also specified at that link .
11. Best Presentation
Presentations should be clear, visually appealing, engaging, and communicate your project to a broad audience. Teams will also be evaluated for their ability to answer questions about their work.
12. Best Software Tool
Regardless what's the topic, iGEM projects often create or adapt computational tools to move the bigger project forward. Because they are born out of a direct practical need, these software tools (or new computational methods) can even prove surprisingly useful for others. Without necessarily being big or complex, they can make the crucial difference to a project's success. This award tries to find and honor such "nuggets" of computational work. To be eligible, your software has to be documented and made available under an OSI approved open source license.
13. Best Supporting Entrepreneurship
The entrepreneurship prize recognizes exceptional effort to build a business case and commercialize an iGEM project. This award is open to all teams to show that entrepreneurship is something all teams can aspire to do with their project. This award can go to an new project, or to a previous project that a team aimed to commercialize. Have you filed a provisional patent on your project/device/process? Have you raised money to build and ship products? Have you pitched your idea to investors and received money? Complete the entrepreneurship section on the Judging form and tell us what you did. As always in iGEM, the aim is to impress the judges!
14. Best Wiki
The team Wiki is the “face” of your iGEM project. The team Wikis serve as the main project information resource for future iGEM students and teams, as well as the rest of the world. This award honors the wiki page that exemplifies what the following year’s Wikis should strive for.
There will be one special prize awarded to teams in the undergraduate section and one to teams in the overgraduate section, providing there are a sufficient number of teams in each section. For tracks or awards with only a few teams competing, we may pool both sections into a single award. There may also be special prizes awarded to high school teams, providing the work is of sufficiently high quality. *Please note judges may choose not to award both undergraduate and overgraduate awards in cases where they have not been sufficiently impressed.
Please send us any comments or suggestions for awards and judging by email to the judging committee at judging AT igem DOT org.